Roulett Staking Plan

[Bhagwan]

Heres a plan I sighted

Target the Dozens sectors
We wait until one of them has had 7 outs before we start betting on it.
We start betting on that dozen with the 7 outs.
Units bet 1,2,3,4,6,9,14,21,32,47,71,106,159=475 for a run of 13 outs+ the 7 previous = 20 outs in a row would have to occure to do ones bank .
It is suggested to have at least 2 or 3 banks if one is going to follow this.

I have tested it & it does seems to work well , as long as one does not encounter 20 outs in a row.
I am not sure what the chances of 20 outs in a row would be , it would be interesting to find out if anyone has seen 20 outs of a Dozen section not getting up.

I would suggest a time limit of no more than 3 hours , then get the hell out of there before they gets your hard earned.

[punter57]

Morning Bhagwan. I suspect that 20 outs would occur sooner or later and that ALL your smaller wins would then be obliterated. However, in reality, it's only the thirteen in a row, after you start betting, that count.
For example, someone who walks in exactly when the first seven "non-shows" have happened could sit beside YOU and decide to just mimic YOUR bets. Of course, this bloke doesn't know you've been waiting 2 hours for this chance NOR that the 7 non-shows have happened. You two are now playing exactly the same and IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE what went before. You'll be winning when the "run of outs" breaks AS WILL HE (without the wait). You can work out how many spins you will see before the "knockout blow" will come (on average) by simple maths. What about doing the system in REVERSE??.

[thefan]

ive actually tried out that system myself and true,it has made me some profits. One thing you forgot to note is that with these bets you usually gotta cover the 0 and 00. The thing with roulette is its a fast paced game and it never stops. Your sitting there waiting for the right moment and maybe within that hour your likly to take risks because of boredom,and start making stupid bets and trying to recoup your lossess.

In gambling set a target and stick to it. In many peoples eyes when their on a winning streak then tend to play on because they think luck is in their favour.

[punter57]

Calling TheFan (and Baggy, too). Go down the threads to "Roulette System Promises Big Rewards" for a discussion of increasing your bets following either a win or a loss. You may be interested in my "ladder-style" progression and knowing when to stop once you are ahead. cheers.

PS. Are you in the States, Mr Fan?

[BJ]

And where do you find a table with such limits..?

I have not seen one with the maximum bet 150 times the size of the minimum bet... Could be wrong though...

Working the even money chances you would expect to have to deal with about 25 losses in a row. I would suggest that the dozens would be at least 35.....

Happy hunting.....

[thefan]

im in Sydney Punter57

[Bhagwan]

On say a $5 table 159x5=$795
$800 is usually the table limit for the 2/1 sectors at Jupitors

[Mr J]

What you should do is take all the effort you put in to devising these silly staking plans which will ultimately fail, and start studying poker or something.

[BJ]

While I don't completely agree with Mr. J, I do believe that your staking system is too aggressive, and will ultimately fail.

[Mr J]

"these silly staking plans which will ultimately fail"

I'm guessing you disagree about this bit. You're not actually disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing with maths ;)

Seriously guys, poker is ripe to make money. You won't beat roulette. Thought the choice would be easy. Ahhh, but staking systems promise big profit for little work, where as you need to put in effort for poker. I get it now...

[thefan]

I was watching a game of roulette yesterday.Rapid roulette (all computerised)

The limit on these games are generally $100 so you can ignore the stacking systems. I noticed that 1 punter in particular who was working with a few other people placed the max bet on one number every round. To a point when the number hasnt landed on the wheel they would take over another terminal also backing the same number,During my time there they had used up to 3 terminals. Eventually it paid off. The number landed and they took all 3 terminals paid out. 36:1 x $100 = $3600 x3 = $10800.Im not sure how much they lost til they won.

Everyones thoughts?

[Steve Morgan]

I've tried this strategy for quite some time and run it over 15,000 spins and while it works really well most of the time you have to be aware that a column/dozen can sleep for a long time. I've seen some sleep for 20+ spins in a row!!!! So be careful with sleeping columns/dozens. I'd hate to see you lose everything!


There are other ways of beating roulette consistently.
I'd post my help here but it would only be banned for looking like spam/********.

WRX