ANYONE LIKE TO TEST??

[darkydog2002]

Its a PROPUN system( from todays newsletter.) but I am away from my own Computer and data base today so unable to do it myself.

HIGHEST AVERAGE PRIZEMONEY EARNER IN RACE

LAST RUN WITHIN 3 LENGTHS

WIN % = 20 +

WON AT COURSE

WON AT DISTANCE

BE IN 1st 4 FAVS AT RACE TIME.

Cheers.
darky.

[monkeyinjapan]

For Sydney and Melbourne, Saturdays only, using NSW divis, since 2003 the results were:

Races = 269
S/R = 32%
POT = minus 6%

Monkeyinjapan

.

[darkydog2002]

Many thanks.
Thats not too bad for a simple system.
Hmm.( thinking cap on. )

Cheers.
darky.

[Chrome Prince]

Using Melbourne divvies MSABP Metro meetings:

-13.55% POT

[darkydog2002]

Not too good either.??

Thanks
darky.

[monkeyinjapan]

For Sydney and Melbourne, Saturdays only, using NSW divis, since 2003 the results were:

Races = 269
S/R = 32%
POT = minus 6%

.


Running only the Melbourne results again, from 2003 to the start of October, it showed:

Races = 131
S/R = 33%
POT = plus 16%

Monkeyinjapan

.

[darkydog2002]

Thank you .
Looks like Melbourne for that one .

Cheers.
darky.

[crash]

How about just these rules ?

HIGHEST AVERAGE PRIZEMONEY EARNER IN RACE

LAST RUN WITHIN 3 LENGTHS

WIN % = 20 +

Might improve the odds for obvious good horses that may not need the last 2 rules.

[monkeyinjapan]

Hi Crash,

With just those three rules, all venues show a significant loss. By adding "won at course" and "won at distance", only Melbourne shows a profit. In fact, the original criterion to limit the selection to the top four favourites actually decreases the POT for Melb racing.

Monkeyinjapan

.