Some neural ratings that work ....

[wesmip1]

All,

Don't know why but I have decided to share some of my profitable systems.

Here is another system which is showing a good profit over time.

Using the neurals set TIM to 5. Set all others to 0.
Track must be rated GOOD to be a selection.
Bet every horse rated 150 or higher.

I am sure there are some people with neural figures that could confirm this techinique is in profit. It hits long shots so there is sometime a long run of outs.


Also try :

Set CF = 5, CP = 5. Any Horse which rates 99+ in both categories where the track is rated GOOD.

Also try :

Combine TIM >149 and (CP>99 & CF>99).Only bet when there is one selection. Either TIM > 149 or (CP>99 and CF>99). Track must be rated GOOD. This has in my database the follwing stats :

158 bets
$221 WIN
$182 PLACE

Anyone with a database on neurals wish to confirm my findings ?

Good Luck

[KennyVictor]

Using the neurals set TIM to 5. Set all others to 0.
Track must be rated GOOD to be a selection.
Bet every horse rated 150 or higher.

491 bets, 107 wins, $63.90 Profit (113% return).


Set CF = 5, CP = 5. Any Horse which rates 99+ in both categories where the track is rated GOOD.

285 bets, 123 wins (43%), $2.60 profit (101% return)

Over about a year.

KV

[wesmip1]

thanks KV.

[michaelg]

Thanks, Wesmip1.

I've never differentiated with track conditions but your results prove their worth. I'll be looking very closely at both systems and probably betting on them. Being an each-way bettor, do you have any results for Place betting?

[Stix]

Impressive.......... v impressive....

[dingoboy]

Good on ya wesmip1.

If they work, ill put a carton in the mail for you.

Cheers DB.

By the way, i set some numbers there this week and it nearly mirrored the 1sr radio tab selections for unitab. CP, CF,TA, tim,wt and dlr all at 5, that did reasonable !

[wesmip1]

michaelg,

I believe Place betting is near break even or just showing a loss.

Thanks

[KennyVictor]

I believe Place betting is near break even or just showing a loss.

On the run I did the better of the two systems returned almost exactly breakeven at 45% strike rate and the other returned about 93% of your cash at a 67% strike rate.
KV