quapi
21st July 2001, 09:25 PM
[NB - Copied from old forum.]
Topic:computer selection systems
HITMAN
computer selection systems
Posted 6-29-2001 12:56
Hi,
Quite a number of contributors have had poor results from computer systems. I have an idea, maybe it will prove benificial, maybe just waste time.
this is only for those systems which use form factors in their selection process. I trust you have kept records of the race ratings, results of the actual winners and divs for those races.
Check which rated horses won. maybe the top 2 or 3 are duds, but 4 and 5 say turn up winners which make a profit. Could be that the bottom raters are the long shot winners paying $50 plus. Pick 1 in
20 and you still come out ahead.
Remember it is overall profit that is important, not the number of winners.
Just an idea that maybe daft enough to work.
Good punting, HITMAN
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: quapi on 2001-07-25 15:12 ]</font>
Topic:computer selection systems
HITMAN
computer selection systems
Posted 6-29-2001 12:56
Hi,
Quite a number of contributors have had poor results from computer systems. I have an idea, maybe it will prove benificial, maybe just waste time.
this is only for those systems which use form factors in their selection process. I trust you have kept records of the race ratings, results of the actual winners and divs for those races.
Check which rated horses won. maybe the top 2 or 3 are duds, but 4 and 5 say turn up winners which make a profit. Could be that the bottom raters are the long shot winners paying $50 plus. Pick 1 in
20 and you still come out ahead.
Remember it is overall profit that is important, not the number of winners.
Just an idea that maybe daft enough to work.
Good punting, HITMAN
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: quapi on 2001-07-25 15:12 ]</font>