michaelg
19th November 2006, 09:36 AM
For several years I've been looking on-and-off at certain races with 8 to 11 runners. They seemed to have performed quite well but my attention often waned only because I did not know how to put an accurate price on the runners.
Now that the neural website has such a facility, from last Tuesday I priced each runner in the qualifying races, and the results have been quite startling.
There have been 21 races since Tuesday.
Backing EVERY horse to Win with NSW TAB, whether they have been under or over my price, has produced a POT of 17%, and with Mark Read a POT of 21%.
Omitting the fave (there has been one race with equal-faves which I did not look at) so that there were only 20 races for this system. And this has produced an even better result - a POT of 35%, but surprisingly with Mark Read a slightly less POT of 33%.
21 races is much too small an example to think that the method/s could have any merit, but only time will tell.
If there are any qualifying races today I'll list them together with the dollar outlay on each horse.
Now that the neural website has such a facility, from last Tuesday I priced each runner in the qualifying races, and the results have been quite startling.
There have been 21 races since Tuesday.
Backing EVERY horse to Win with NSW TAB, whether they have been under or over my price, has produced a POT of 17%, and with Mark Read a POT of 21%.
Omitting the fave (there has been one race with equal-faves which I did not look at) so that there were only 20 races for this system. And this has produced an even better result - a POT of 35%, but surprisingly with Mark Read a slightly less POT of 33%.
21 races is much too small an example to think that the method/s could have any merit, but only time will tell.
If there are any qualifying races today I'll list them together with the dollar outlay on each horse.