Ratings Races Only

[cinna]

Back anything over $15! Another 5 today with 3 big roughies @ Taree, Hawkesbury & Tatura which continues the success of this method. Just hope they keep running them!!!

[Shaun]

Can you explain a little on what you have said

[cinna]

Hawkesbury R5 0 - 70 rated race. Winner $23
Taree R3 0 - 70 rated. Winner $42
Tatura R7 0 - 62 Winner $14
Tatura R8 0 - 62 Winner $6
Ballarat R9 0 - 72 Winner $3

Vic & NSW are the only states involved at present. Looks like I'd better amend to over $10. Check past results & it does throw up more than it's fair share of big prices with action most days. I think the mares race at MV won by Clifton Lass was another one.

[AngryPixie]

Back anything over $15! Another 5 today with 3 big roughies @ Taree, Hawkesbury & Tatura which continues the success of this method. Just hope they keep running them!!!Hawkesbury R5 0 - 70 rated race. Winner $23
Taree R3 0 - 70 rated. Winner $42
Tatura R7 0 - 62 Winner $14
Tatura R8 0 - 62 Winner $6
Ballarat R9 0 - 72 Winner $3

Vic & NSW are the only states involved at present. Looks like I'd better amend to over $10. Check past results & it does throw up more than it's fair share of big prices with action most days. I think the mares race at MV won by Clifton Lass was another one.Cinna

My initial reaction is that this is a really good way to go broke.

I count well over 200 runners runners starting at $10 or greater on UniTAB at yesterdays VIC and NSW meetings.

It doesn't look overly profitable to me. A $1 investment on every $10 plus runner would have given you a profit of $3.60. Doesn't leave much room for error. Can you elborate?

Pixies

[cinna]

RATINGS races, RATINGS races. How many y/day? 5 5 5. Average of 12 runners/field = 60 horses. Using a little bit of commonsense (pretty scarce by the looks of things) I've been backing, at most, 5 in the one race. Take it or leave it, doesn't effect me.
Narr. today Races 3, 5 ,6. None @ Pakenham.

[AngryPixie]

RATINGS races, RATINGS races. How many y/day? 5 5 5. Average of 12 runners/field = 60 horses. Using a little bit of commonsense (pretty scarce by the looks of things) I've been backing, at most, 5 in the one race. Take it or leave it, doesn't effect me.
Narr. today Races 3, 5 ,6. None @ Pakenham.
I see. That wasn't made clear earlier. Best of luck. Hope it works out for you.

Pixie

[Shaun]

race 8 looks like a ratings race

[cinna]

Whoops, was in a hurry, it is too, thanks Shaun. Being sensible, you really couldn't have the 2 roughies in the race just gone @ Narr R3 but the next longest in a 7 horse field was a last start winner ridden by M Cahill, top rider & in form so I only did the one @ $7 so happy again :D.

[stugots]

Whoops, was in a hurry, it is too, thanks Shaun. Being sensible, you really couldn't have the 2 roughies in the race just gone @ Narr R3 but the next longest in a 7 horse field was a last start winner ridden by M Cahill, top rider & in form so I only did the one @ $7 so happy again :D.

making it up as you go along always looks good, no?

[Beagle]

I smell a rat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[crash]

Back anything over $15! Another 5 today with 3 big roughies @ Taree, Hawkesbury & Tatura which continues the success of this method. Just hope they keep running them!!!

I don't see how as you claim in your previous post you backed the winner of:

r3 NARROMINE
CLOSING ODDS [STAB]

1 SYSTEMATIC (3) F WATTS 6.00 2nd
2 MUHAYAA'S IMAGE (5) J GALEA 55.60
3 STITCHEM (4) C LUNDHOLM 6.60
4 HELGAFELL (2) K NESTOR 5.60
5 DESERT FAIRY (6) M A CAHILL 8.50 win
6 BLACK ORCHID (1) G RYAN 1.90 3rd
7 KEN'S PICK (7) GLEN C DAVIS 26.90

Yes the winner [a photo] was ridden by a good jock last start, but in a maiden so it deserved the odds it won at, but they weren't $15 + as your original rules above at the start of this thread suggest. In fact you ruled out the only runners over $15.

You seem to be making up the rules as you go to suit your post-race results [?]

[crash]

I smell a rat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Me too!

[crash]

Hawkesbury R5 0 - 70 rated race. Winner $23
Taree R3 0 - 70 rated. Winner $42
Tatura R7 0 - 62 Winner $14
Tatura R8 0 - 62 Winner $6
Ballarat R9 0 - 72 Winner $3

Vic & NSW are the only states involved at present. Looks like I'd better amend to over $10. Check past results & it does throw up more than it's fair share of big prices with action most days. I think the mares race at MV won by Clifton Lass was another one.

DESERT FAIRY had a rating of 95 [2nd highest]. Why would that be a bet ? OK, you amended your rules to over $10 odds rather than $15, but that definitely rules out Desert Fairy as a bet.

[AngryPixie]

RATINGS races, RATINGS races. How many y/day? 5 5 5. Average of 12 runners/field = 60 horses. Using a little bit of commonsense (pretty scarce by the looks of things) I've been backing, at most, 5 in the one race. Take it or leave it, doesn't effect me.
Narr. today Races 3, 5 ,6. None @ Pakenham.Cinna

I wasn't going to bother with this again, but I'm not often accused of a scarce amount of commonsense after such little provocation.

Reading through the posts others have made today, it's clear that a little more explanation on your part as to how your system works would really help to clear things up for people. Naturally it's up to you. I fully understand that when it comes to systems that a secret shared is a secret lost.

Sorry to see no $10 plus winners at Narromine today. There's always tomorrow I guess.

Pixie

[crash]

Cinna

Sorry to see no $10 plus winners at Narromine today. There's always tomorrow I guess.

Pixie

Watch for the post-race results!

[go4it]

Who's ratings?????

Good luck if it's working for you,but I find it a bit harsh(actually,downright rude)that you suggest there is nobody on here with any commonsense.Maybe if you explained a bit more clearly than just ratings,ratings and $15 winners someone (like me) with no commonsense might understand more clearly.

[Shaun]

I will explain exactly what cinna is talking about it seams more people are interested in bashing them instead of adding to the thread, no wonder this forum has gone down the crapper.

Ratings Races are these new races that the tab has decided to to give us you will see them listed as (RB78 C, RB78 C ,RB62 N ,) these are the three races they have today.

CESSNOCK RACE 2 (RB78 C)
WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB78 C)
WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB62 N)

Now what cinna is saying is that these types of races are producing some longer priced winners, i would think this may be a short lived situation until everyone gets a handle on the class factor of the horses running in these races and is able to work it in to there form study.

If the opportunity is there take it while it lasts, i hope this explains it a little better.

As for making rules up as they go thats about all you could do in this case as it is a new way of making money everyone has to find what works and exploit it.

[AngryPixie]

Shaun

Thanks. The Ratings Based Programming races. Now I understand.

I wonder if the phenomenom Cinna has exposed is more a function of the quality of runners going around this time of year than anything else.

Pix

[go4it]

Just for the record,I wasn't "bashing" anyone,or their ideas.I simply asked"who's ratings?"As I live in QLD.we don't get that here,that is why I asked for a clearer explanation as to what it was all about.

[Shaun]

NP go4it i could see where this thread was headed thats why i thought i would explain to all, Cinna hope you are happy with the post as i know this is realy your idea not mine.

[crash]

Cinna was not being clear as to his method and treating those who asked for reasonable clarification [couldn't read his mind] as dumb twits.
After only a 1/2 doz. posts here [and being a new member of the forum] with that attitude, coping a bit of a 'serve' was fair enough all things considered.