View Full Version : Statistics on runs from spell
Pauls123
8th November 2008, 07:04 PM
Hi all,
Just trying to improve my sectional times plan, which is treading water at the moment, I thought I might also back check the history of each entry I include following an analysis of the weekend sydney and melbourne races. With a view of looking at the horse's similar run in it's last/previous preparations.
I'm not sure if there is a "angle" in all this but does anyone have stats on races that are won by runners having their such and such run from a spell. I would expect that these would change as the distance increases.
Thanks,
Paul
crash
9th November 2008, 06:24 AM
Horses mostly win when they are fit. Some horse [not many] are presented fit to win at 1st. or 2nd start but in general you will see a lot of horses that will win this prep., winning during there 3rd.-5th. up start. Age plays a part in fitness with older horses taking longer to reach their peak. After that it's mostly downhill until next prep.
Pauls123
9th November 2008, 09:17 AM
thanks for that Crash, It's pretty much what I had a feeling of. This is something I intend to now take a closer look at. Following each weekend meeting I go through all the sectional times and copy them to a spreadsheet. The spreadsheet tells me all sorts of things like tempo of the race etc, how many lengths a horse gained on the winner in the final 600/400, and vice versa. I do this while watching a replay of each race on tv.
But just to gain that possible extra bit of advantage, I now intend to check the history in previous preps of such fancied horse.
Who knows, might be a waste of time, but at least it keeps me outa the pubs...!!
Paul
crash
9th November 2008, 10:05 AM
'But just to gain that possible extra bit of advantage, I now intend to check the history in previous preps of such fancied horse'.
A nice thing to remember is that horse's are creatures of past habit.
partypooper
9th November 2008, 11:22 AM
most races of 1200m or less are won by first uppers! true!
crash
9th November 2008, 12:45 PM
Races of less than 1200m are a bad bet. Conversely to your statement, 1200m or more races are not won by 1st uppers Party.
darkydog2002
9th November 2008, 01:29 PM
I once asked Warren Block the same question and the answer he gave me was that every horse is an individual .Look at the particular horses profile.
Cheers.
darky
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.