Third up losers

[crazyjord]

Horse won first up after a spell.
Second up ran sixth or worse.
Using one more filter there have been 34 selections for 34 losers.

Today
Quirindi race 9 number 5 Goldrossa.

[MyHatMyCoat]

Impressive stats crazyjord, all or most well fancied?

[partypooper]

First thoughts are "I agree" however $2.10c is not a bad place divi, how many of those 34 were placed?, POT etc?

[MyHatMyCoat]

Good point partypooper.

[Bhagwan]

Thanks for sharing your findings Crazygord.
Impressive looking results.

I noted a strong result, targeting the 3rd uppers after a spell.
To be lay bet to Liability 4% of bank.
e.g. 100.00 bank x 4% = $4.00 liability.
Say selection is 5/1 (6.00)
Divide 5 into $4.00 = O/L .80


RULES
.Must of run 6,7,8 or 9th in one or both its last 2 runs since resuming .
Example.
x61, x59, x17, x09, x62, x93 ect

Bet selection to Liability 4% of bank
If 2 or more qualifiers, Lay bet to Liability on them all, if price is acceptable.

There are a number of bets to be had each day.
In the last 50 bets, we were only bit once at $5.00

Betting to Liability is the safest way to Lay bet, especially if their price is $5.50+

One may wish to introduce a min-max field size to your liking.

Cheers.

[crazyjord]

First thoughts are "I agree" however $2.10c is not a bad place divi, how many of those 34 were placed?, POT etc?
Sorry party i havent been keeping any stats on this,i just noticed a trend happening so started watching them a bit more.
There was 1 day in there with 5 selections and none of them even ran a place.

[crazyjord]

Impressive stats crazyjord, all or most well fancied?The other filter i put in makes nearly all of them well fancied,but some of them do drift out a bit.:)