Top Don Scott Raters Performance (Not adjusted for R&S Issues)

[UselessBettor]

I am slowly catching up Feb and added another week of data for you guys to test against. There are over 65K records in the DB now.

There are issues with place testing and I know I need to fix them but I haven't had time. So please don't test place systems for the moment.

Here are the results of the top don scott raters as per the website. So they are NOT adjusted as per the identified issues on the other thread about R&S issues.




There were 65607 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.There were 6244 selections for the System
There were 5731 races for the System
There were 1464 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 23.45%
There were $6244.47 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $0.47 or a percentage profit/loss of 0.01%

Test Another System (http://testyoursystem.000space.com/TestSystem.php)

The Rules used were : donScottRank = 1

[Bhagwan]

This is interesting.

Don Scott =1
Last start 5th-20th

21%SR
10% POT


Yet LS 1st -4th
24%SR
-4% LOT
That's funny.

There were 1651 selections for the System
There were 1602 races for the System
There were 343 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 20.78%
There were $1816.22 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $165.22 or a percentage profit/loss of 10.01%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : lastStart >= 5 and lastStart <=20 and donScottRank = 1

[UselessBettor]

good previous runs are usually overbet by the public I guess.

[Dale]

Hi UB,

Thanks heaps for the link to your site and the info youve provided on the forum, it has saved me months and months of painful form guide research.

Legend.

[Dale]

A bit of a self imposed break coming up so while im at it cheers to all contributers, ive learnt a lot.

[moeee]

A bit of a self imposed break coming up so while im at it cheers to all contributers, ive learnt a lot.

Admiration and envy from me that you are capable of showing discipline.
Is there another website , without promoting it on this Forum , where you contribute Dale?

[The Ocho]

Hi UB,

I think there's something wrong with the testing site as I can't believe that this is correct. I take it this is the BF fave.

I've come up with this by clicking on 1 for "Win Price Rank (Bet Side)" however priceRank < 90 comes up at the bottom of the page which I haven't pressed.

There were 65788 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.

There were 7018 selections for the System
There were 6896 races for the System
There were 2427 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 34.58%
There were $7339.18 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $321.18 or a percentage profit/loss of 4.58%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : priceRank < 90 and priceRank = 1

[UselessBettor]

Hi UB,

I think there's something wrong with the testing site as I can't believe that this is correct. I take it this is the BF fave.

I've come up with this by clicking on 1 for "Win Price Rank (Bet Side)" however priceRank < 90 comes up at the bottom of the page which I haven't pressed.

There were 65788 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.

There were 7018 selections for the System
There were 6896 races for the System
There were 2427 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 34.58%
There were $7339.18 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $321.18 or a percentage profit/loss of 4.58%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : priceRank < 90 and priceRank = 1Ocho. The PriceRank <90 is in there just as a catch all in case some bad data got through there for horses which were scratched, Any horse which is scratched has a price rank of 99 or 98.

It also looks like the favs have had a good run in the last 6 months as a the strike rate is sitting on the high side for favourties. You may also find that profit erodes as the favourites strike rate returns to a lower figure.