WillB
5th November 2012, 08:04 PM
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> The Tattsbet/Unitab rankings have been mentioned in this thread.
I use them in a Laying the Field method where all runners for a qualifying race must have a minimum of three starts, and it also depends on the price of the fave. The liability for each horse is calculated exclusively on Unitab's rankings and am currently showing a profit on 74 for every 100 races.
If a winning horse is under the odds as per Unitab's ratings there is more often than not another horse over the odds that compensates for it and consequently provides a profit on the race.
I don't know if this is important to anyone but it has got me currently thinking about betting the field as per Unitab's ratings. Maybe someone might also consider Unitab's ratings?
<!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";**** </style> <![endif]--> Hi Michaelg - after an absence of about 9 months I am back and have noticed that you have being doing a few things in relation to these ratings with some success. The above did not attract much attention, but I think it may be worth exploring and hence this thread.
I will explore more tomorrow ... Will.
I use them in a Laying the Field method where all runners for a qualifying race must have a minimum of three starts, and it also depends on the price of the fave. The liability for each horse is calculated exclusively on Unitab's rankings and am currently showing a profit on 74 for every 100 races.
If a winning horse is under the odds as per Unitab's ratings there is more often than not another horse over the odds that compensates for it and consequently provides a profit on the race.
I don't know if this is important to anyone but it has got me currently thinking about betting the field as per Unitab's ratings. Maybe someone might also consider Unitab's ratings?
<!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";**** </style> <![endif]--> Hi Michaelg - after an absence of about 9 months I am back and have noticed that you have being doing a few things in relation to these ratings with some success. The above did not attract much attention, but I think it may be worth exploring and hence this thread.
I will explore more tomorrow ... Will.