PDA

View Full Version : RaceCensus Database


Chrome Prince
17th August 2014, 04:13 PM
Thought I'd post some interesting data from RaceCensus.

Last start winners on country tracks that started favourite...
33.39% Win
-12.40% Loss

Last start winners on provincial tracks that started favourite...
33.04% Win
-13.50% Loss

Last start winners on metropolitan tracks that started favourite...
35.15% Win
-10.59% Loss

First starters on country tracks that started favourite...
37.36% Win
-13.96% Loss

First starters on provincial tracks that started favourite...
36.55% Win
-15.86% Loss

First starters on metropolitan tracks that started favourite...
34.92% Win
-19.00% Loss

Makes for some interesting thought.
Took less than 5 minutes for the entire database to process and calculate over 15+ years of data ;)

Vortech
19th August 2014, 08:42 PM
Thankyou CP

Where there's dirt there is gold...

garyf
19th August 2014, 09:32 PM
My data on things like CP's database is out of date.

Last time I looked backing favourites lost 12.3%,
At around a div of $2.8 and a strike/rate of 31%.

These figures are about 6-7 years old.

But "IF" close to the mark in CP'S stats anything,
Better than the above is a starting point beating the average
albeit a losing one.

So last start winners on metropolitan tracks.


Cheers.
Garyf.

Chrome Prince
20th August 2014, 03:06 PM
I've only revealed half the story here, because it wouldn't be fair to existing clients. The data is correct, but there is further advantage breaking it down into categories.

Garyf, I've done a quick test on Metropolitan favourites for the last 15 plus years, here are the results:

31.60% Strike Rate
11.52% Loss on turnover
$2.80 average dividend

Then...

Jan 2008 to July 31st 2014
32.71% Strike Rate
8.96% Loss on turnover
$2.78 average dividend

Things to consider: There have been many changes in track surfaces since 2008 and race classes. We have also had one or two champion horses.

darkydog2002
20th August 2014, 04:09 PM
Not surprised.
The trick is to find the ones that are not false favs.
Not hard if one can read form.
i.e Backmarker at 1000 M

At a disadvantage at any distance in fact.
(more prone to checks ,blocks ,wide running.)

garyf
20th August 2014, 04:31 PM
I've only revealed half the story here, because it wouldn't be fair to existing clients. The data is correct, but there is further advantage breaking it down into categories.

Garyf, I've done a quick test on Metropolitan favourites for the last 15 plus years, here are the results:

31.60% Strike Rate
11.52% Loss on turnover
$2.80 average dividend

Then...

Jan 2008 to July 31st 2014
32.71% Strike Rate
8.96% Loss on turnover
$2.78 average dividend

Things to consider: There have been many changes in track surfaces since 2008 and race classes. We have also had one or two champion horses.

Thanks, will enter this current new data 2008=>as a reference & benchmark,
For myself in the future.

Cheers.
Garyf.

Dale
20th August 2014, 05:46 PM
I've only revealed half the story here, because it wouldn't be fair to existing clients. The data is correct, but there is further advantage breaking it down into categories.

Garyf, I've done a quick test on Metropolitan favourites for the last 15 plus years, here are the results:

31.60% Strike Rate
11.52% Loss on turnover
$2.80 average dividend

Then...

Jan 2008 to July 31st 2014
32.71% Strike Rate
8.96% Loss on turnover
$2.78 average dividend

Things to consider: There have been many changes in track surfaces since 2008 and race classes. We have also had one or two champion horses.

I wonder what role field size has in all this. Id say field size and a more intelligent market.

garyf
20th August 2014, 06:00 PM
I wonder what role field size has in all this. Id say field size and a more intelligent market.

Yep the 1st part Field/Size, obviously the smaller the size,
The higher the strike/rate & the lower the odds.

I can address all this with my own data, what I didn't,
Have was a benchmark figure of "ALL" favourites for,
The last 6 odd years just to use as a guide to any new,
Strategies I may want to look at re that stat..

Market being more intelligent I will leave for others,
With data-bases to comment.

Certainly with my own, nothing is showing up as,
Of recent years but you may be right.

Cheers.

Chrome Prince
20th August 2014, 06:25 PM
From my studies, there is no evidence to suggest that the market is any more intelligent (as a whole group), than it was 50 years ago.

Chrome Prince
20th August 2014, 06:59 PM
Favourites by raceday:

Monday: 31.70% S/R
Tuesday: 32.43% S/R
Wednesday: 31.64% S/R
Thursday: 32.01% S/R
Friday: 32.02% S/R
Saturday: 31.74% S/R
Sunday: 31.39% S/R

Chrome Prince
20th August 2014, 07:07 PM
P.S.

Saturday
Metro: 31.33% S/R
Provincial: 32.71% S/R
Country: 31.06% S/R

Vortech
21st August 2014, 05:36 AM
A little off topic but an interesting find

When the rail is out at the Valley - Leaders have a huge advantage at night but not during the day.

Thoughts?

Chrome Prince
21st August 2014, 10:05 AM
Leaders still have an advantage over certain distances at Moonee Valley.
But when the rail is out, the camber of the turn is tighter, so those up front do have a distinct advantage coupled with the short straight.
Flemington on the other hand, makes no difference at all.
Canterbury is another track, that has the same bias.

Chrome Prince
21st August 2014, 11:02 AM
For example:
The average settling position for winners at Moonee Valley, followed by their position at the 400m mark over various distances.

1000m 3.50 3.10
1200m 4.02 3.52
1500m 4.90 3.61
1600m 4.69 3.62
2040m 4.78 3.22

Even over distance you want to be on pace, but at the turn you want to be leading or in the leading pack with a clear run.

evajb001
21st August 2014, 11:36 AM
The thing is CP for Moonee Valley in particular Jockeys, Trainers and even majority of punters are aware of the leader bias at MV. Does this mean the value is potentially eroded on front settling type horses. Or even that the pace in some races is so extreme because everyone knows of the bias that it actually ends up favouring mid to back runners?

I know the stats still support a POT for front runners at MV at most distances, but I still think the questions above are relevant.

I think finding leader/front bias at tracks which are less obviously or well known to be suited to leaders is a good approach. For instance i've found Belmont to be pretty supportive of leader types whereas the long straight would in general be deemed as a negative to leader types.

Chrome Prince
21st August 2014, 10:24 PM
I think finding leader/front bias at tracks which are less obviously or well known to be suited to leaders is a good approach. For instance i've found Belmont to be pretty supportive of leader types whereas the long straight would in general be deemed as a negative to leader types.

Josh, you are spot on with this over certain distances.
It is not necessarily the length of the straight, but more importantly the size of the track itself and radius of particular turns. The effect on horses on different radiuses is the most important factor in leader bias, mix this with pace (various distances) and there are hidden gems.

Chrome Prince
22nd August 2014, 05:45 PM
Thought I'd post some answers to questions I frequently get:

The database is built on the Filemaker Pro Advanced platform.
All data is exportable to csv, excel, etc.
The database can be used on multiple computers.
It contains all TAB metropolitan, provincial and country races from 1999.
Dividends are from NSW TAB.
Exports can be fully customised, in that you can pick and choose which fields can be exported. This makes it a lot less intensive and easier to work with data you want.

Here is a full list of the fields contained in the database, along with explanations, each of these fields can be queried (apart from the summary fields of course:

<pre>
Field Name Field Type Further Explanation
2nd Last Run 400m Number Position at 400m
2nd Last Run 800m Number Position at 800m
2nd Last Run Age Text Race Age Restriction
2nd Last Run All Number Apprentice Allowance
2nd Last Run BP Number Barrier
2nd Last Run Class Text
2nd Last Run Date Date
2nd Last Run Distance Number
2nd Last Run Event Text
2nd Last Run Going Text Track Condition
2nd Last Run Jockey Text
2nd Last Run Last 600m Number Sectional Time
2nd Last Run Limit Number
2nd Last Run Margin Number
2nd Last Run Placing Number
2nd Last Run Prizemoney Number
2nd Last Run Prizemoney Won Number
2nd Last Run Rest Text Race Sex Restriction
2nd Last Run SP Number
2nd Last Run Starters Number
2nd Last Run Time Number Race Time
2nd Last Run Track Surface Text
2nd Last Run Venue Text
2nd Last Run Wgt Number Weight
2nd Last Run Winner Text Winner or second
3rd Last Run 400m Number Position at 400m
3rd Last Run 800m Number Position at 800m
3rd Last Run Age Text Race Age Restriction
3rd Last Run All Number Apprentice Allowance
3rd Last Run BP Number Barrier
3rd Last Run Class Text
3rd Last Run Date Date
3rd Last Run Distance Number
3rd Last Run Event Text
3rd Last Run Going Text Track Condition
3rd Last Run Jockey Text
3rd Last Run Last 600m Number Sectional Time
3rd Last Run Limit Number
3rd Last Run Margin Number
3rd Last Run Placing Number
3rd Last Run Prizemoney Number
3rd Last Run Prizemoney Won Number
3rd Last Run Rest Text Race Sex Restriction
3rd Last Run SP Number
3rd Last Run Starters Number
3rd Last Run Time Number Race Time
3rd Last Run Track Surface Text
3rd Last Run Venue Text
3rd Last Run Wgt Number Weight
3rd Last Run Winner Text Winner or second
4th Last Run 400m Number Position at 400m
4th Last Run 800m Number Position at 800m
4th Last Run Age Text Race Age Restriction
4th Last Run All Number Apprentice Allowance
4th Last Run BP Number Barrier
4th Last Run Class Text
4th Last Run Date Date
4th Last Run Distance Number
4th Last Run Event Text
4th Last Run Going Text Track Condition
4th Last Run Jockey Text
4th Last Run Last 600m Number Sectional Time
4th Last Run Limit Number
4th Last Run Margin Number
4th Last Run Placing Number
4th Last Run Prizemoney Number
4th Last Run Prizemoney Won Number
4th Last Run Rest Text Race Sex Restriction
4th Last Run SP Number
4th Last Run Starters Number
4th Last Run Time Number Race Time
4th Last Run Track Surface Text
4th Last Run Venue Text
4th Last Run Wgt Number Weight
4th Last Run Winner Text Winner or second
5th Last Run 400m Number Position at 400m
5th Last Run 800m Number Position at 800m
5th Last Run Age Text Race Age Restriction
5th Last Run All Number Apprentice Allowance
5th Last Run BP Number Barrier
5th Last Run Class Text
5th Last Run Date Date
5th Last Run Distance Number
5th Last Run Event Text
5th Last Run Going Text Track Condition
5th Last Run Jockey Text
5th Last Run Last 600m Number Sectional Time
5th Last Run Limit Number
5th Last Run Margin Number
5th Last Run Placing Number
5th Last Run Prizemoney Number
5th Last Run Prizemoney Won Number
5th Last Run Rest Text Race Sex Restriction
5th Last Run SP Number
5th Last Run Starters Number
5th Last Run Time Number Race Time
5th Last Run Track Surface Text
5th Last Run Venue Text
5th Last Run Wgt Number Weight
5th Last Run Winner Text Winner or second
Age Number
Age Restriction Text Race Age Restriction
Api Number Average Prizemoney
Api Rank Number Average Prizemoney Rank
Apprentice Text Y/N
Apprentice Claim Text Race Claiming Restrictions Y/N
Barrier Number
Career 2nds Number
Career 3rds Number
Career Place Percentage Number
Career Place Percentage Rank Number
Career Prizemoney Number
Career Prizemoney Rank Number
Career Starts Number
Career Win Percentage Number
Career Win Percentage Rank Number
Career Wins Number
Closing Price Number TAB Price
Closing Price Rank Number
Colour Text
Date Date
Day Text Day Of Week
Days Break Number Days Break Since Last Start
Days2 Number Days Break Since 2nd Last Start
Days3 Number Days Break Since 3rd Last Start
Days4 Number Days Break Since 4th Last Start
Days5 Number Days Break Since 5th Last Start
Dead 2nds Number
Dead 3rds Number
Dead Place Percentage Number
Dead Starts Number
Dead Win Percentage Number
Dead Wins Number
Distance 2nds Number
Distance 3rds Number
Distance Place Percentage Number
Distance Place Percentage Rank Number
Distance Starts Number
Distance Variation Number
Distance Win Percentage Number
Distance Win Percentage Rank Number
Distance Wins Number
Fast 2nds Number
Fast 3rds Number
Fast Place Percentage Number
Fast Starts Number
Fast Win Percentage Number
Fast Wins Number
Favourite Premium Number Second Favourite TAB price minus Favourite TAB price
First Up 2nds Number
First Up 3rds Number
First Up Place Percentage Number
First Up Place Percentage Rank Number
First Up Starts Number
First Up Win Percentage Number
First Up Win Percentage Rank Number
First Up Wins Number
Going Text Track Condition
Good 2nds Number
Good 3rds Number
Good Place Percentage Number
Good Starts Number
Good Win Percentage Number
Good Wins Number
Handicapping Text Handicap, Weight For Age, Set Weights etc.
Heavy 2nds Number
Heavy 3rds Number
Heavy Place Percentage Number
Heavy Starts Number
Heavy Win Percentage Number
Heavy Wins Number
Horse Text
Jockey Text
Last Run 400m Number Position at 400m
Last Run 800m Number Position at 800m
Last Run Age Text Race Age Restriction
Last Run All Number Apprentice Allowance
Last Run BP Number Barrier
Last Run Class Text
Last Run Date Date
Last Run Distance Number
Last Run Event Text
Last Run Going Text Track Condition
Last Run Jockey Text
Last Run Last 600m Number Sectional Time
Last Run Limit Number
Last Run Margin Number
Last Run Metro Track Text
Last Run Placing Number
Last Run Prizemoney Number
Last Run Prizemoney Won Number
Last Run Rest Text Race Sex Restriction
Last Run SP Number
Last Run Starters Number
Last Run Time Number Race Time
Last Run Track Surface Text
Last Run Venue Text
Last Run Wgt Number Weight
Last Run Winner Text Winner or second
Place Number Place TAB Dividend
Place Average Dividend Summary
Place Count Summary
Place Maximum Dividend Summary
Place Minimum Dividend Summary
Place POT Summary
Place Profit Summary
Place Return Summary
Place Strike Rate Summary
Place System Viability Summary
Prizemoney Variation Number Increase or Decrease in Race Prizemoney from Last Start
Pwls Rank Number Prizemoney Won Last Start Rank
Pwlts Number Prizemoney Won Last Three Starts
Pwlts Rank Number Prizemoney Won Last Three Starts Rank
Race Number
Race Class Text
Race Distance Number
Race Name Text
Race Prizemoney Number
Runners Number
Runs Since Spell Number
Same Going Text
Same Track Text
Selections Summary
Settled1 Number Last Start Settling Position
Settled2 Number Second Last Start Settling Position
Settled3 Number Third Last Start Settling Position
Settled4 Number Fourth Last Start Settling Position
Settled5 Number Fifth Last Start Settling Position
Sex Text
Sex Restriction Text Race Sex Restriction
Slow 2nds Number
Slow 3rds Number
Slow Place Percentage Number
Slow Starts Number
Slow Win Percentage Number
Slow Wins Number
State Text VIC, NSW, QLD, WA etc.
Tab Number
Track Text
Track 2nds Number
Track 3rds Number
Track Class Text Metro or Country
Track Place Percentage Number
Track Place Percentage Rank Number
Track Starts Number
Track Surface Text Turf, Dirt, All Weather
Track Win Percentage Number
Track Win Percentage Rank Number
Track Wins Number
Trainer Text
Weight Number
Weight Limit Number Race Weight Limit
Weight Ratio Number Topweight weight minus Second Topweight weight
Weight Variation Number Increase or Decrease in Weight from previous start
Win Number TAB Win Dividend
Win Average Dividend Summary
Win Count Summary
Win Maximum Dividend Summary
Win Minimum Dividend Summary
Win POT Summary Profit On Turnover
Win Profit Summary
Win Return Summary
Win Strike Rate Summary
Win System Viability Summary Profit or Loss Divided by Maximum Win Dividend
</pre>

garyf
22nd August 2014, 07:07 PM
Hi CP.

Glad you mentioned F-M-P in your post.
We are currently in the process of having,
All our excel spread sheets setup & put into it.

Have heard it's a great way to survey data,
When sheets get clogged up with data.

Purchased Pro-12v4 just getting some estimates,
Now and what's required time & expense wise.

Cheers.

Chrome Prince
22nd August 2014, 09:20 PM
Gary, I am a FMP Developer, so maybe I could help out.
If you care to drop me a line, I can give you a quote.
That quotation will be cc'd to Ozmium, so they will receive a commission from me.
It depends on your quotations, I may be able to do better or worse, depending what your requirements are.

racestats at hotmail dot com if you're interested, otherwise good luck with the project, it really is a great and more efficient platform.

garyf
22nd August 2014, 09:50 PM
Gary, I am a FMP Developer, so maybe I could help out.
If you care to drop me a line, I can give you a quote.
That quotation will be cc'd to Ozmium, so they will receive a commission from me.
It depends on your quotations, I may be able to do better or worse, depending what your requirements are.

racestats at hotmail dot com if you're interested, otherwise good luck with the project, it really is a great and more efficient platform.

No worries C/P thanks for that.

I will pass this task on to one of my racing,
Partners & assign him this task.

I will also get in touch with my,
Own details once he has made contact.

Give us around 2 x weeks for us to work it all,
Out then we will go from there.

To give you a time limit the project must be finished with payment made By the 31/12/2014.

We all have the product the setup is beyond us.

Leave the Ozmium part up to you, no problems there.

Cheers.
Garyf.

Chrome Prince
22nd August 2014, 10:55 PM
No worries garyf, pity is that I could have saved you purchasing FMP as I can develop runtime solutions for as many of you as required without the need to actually own a copy of the software.
I have the Advanced Developer Licence, which enables me to do this.
However, before you do anything mad like return it, we would need to discuss exactly what you want. Probably in terms of automation, coding , or just data analysis.
There are certain automation limitations that only additional plugins will give you, which may require another coder. But that's an unknown at this point.
Leave it all to you.

Chrome Prince
24th August 2014, 01:12 PM
Metro Tracks
Group One Favourites 33.57%
Group Two Favourites 33.31%
Group Three Favourites 30.59%
Listed Race Favourites 30.15%
Quality Race Favourites 30.14%
Open Class Favourites 31.88%
Maiden Class Favourites 34.74%

Interesting!

garyf
24th August 2014, 02:56 PM
No worries garyf, pity is that I could have saved you purchasing FMP as I can develop runtime solutions for as many of you as required without the need to actually own a copy of the software.
I have the Advanced Developer Licence, which enables me to do this.
However, before you do anything mad like return it, we would need to discuss exactly what you want. Probably in terms of automation, coding , or just data analysis.
There are certain automation limitations that only additional plugins will give you, which may require another coder. But that's an unknown at this point.
Leave it all to you.

No worries CP.

Matt will be in contact with you shortly,
He hasn't purchased one yet & I have stopped.
Him for the moment, see what eventuates.

Cheers.
Garyf.

Chrome Prince
24th August 2014, 05:47 PM
No worries at all. I may or may not be able to help, but I am a developer, so there might be a significant saving if I can help.
That time frame is well within reason, would expect it to take no more than a few weeks.

Chrome Prince
29th August 2014, 06:28 PM
Here is an example of how important it is to have enough data when backtesting systems.

I was trialling a system and looked at the results for 2014.

There are benchmarks I use such as minimum number of selection to base a method on, at the pointy end of the market, I'd suggest a minimum of 2,000 selections, but I now advocate a minimum of 1,000 winners regardless of market price. I feel this gives a much more accurate picture of chances of ongoing performance. Of course, it going to be pretty difficult to get 1,000 winners out of most methods on outsiders. But that's my thoughts on why so many systems collapse even though "I have 3,000 races and it shows a profit."
The answer invariably is that of the 3,000 races, the profit is based on one or two outsiders.

This is why RaceCensus has a System Viability calculation, which is the profit divided by the maximum win dividend. It tells you how many winners make up your profit.

<pre>2014 Only
WIN PLACE
Bets: 263 260
Winners: 98 176
S.R.: 37.3% 67.7%
Outlay: 263.00 260.00
Return : 262.60 264.54
Profit : -0.40 4.54
P.O.T. : -0.2% 1.7% </pre>



<pre>2007 to 2014
WIN PLACE
Bets: 2902 2889
Winners: 960 1857
S.R.: 33.1% 64.3%
Outlay: 2902.00 2889.00
Return : 2580.90 2713.54
Profit : -321.10 -175.46
P.O.T. : -11.1% -6.1% </pre>

Rinconpaul
29th August 2014, 06:48 PM
I've got to respect anyone that amasses a database. I've just spent a solid week collecting a years data with only 3 variables, that's the boring part. Then you start trying to disseminate that data and you start to find all these anomalies. Selections with equal rankings, late scratchings, incorrect source data..... The list goes on. All combine to throw out the true representation of what's really going on.

'All Hail' the database builders, a lot harder than it would appear.

Chrome Prince
29th August 2014, 07:27 PM
Especially if you have little bit of OCD and are a perfectionist - it's brutal!

FredTheMug
29th August 2014, 07:46 PM
I've got to respect anyone that wins without a database. That's impressive.

The database part is by far the most boring thing that I do. It's just mind-numbingly boring, it takes everything I have to not fall asleep at the computer.

Rinconpaul
29th August 2014, 08:08 PM
Especially if you have little bit of OCD and are a perfectionist - it's brutal!

I think that a touch of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is a necessary prerequisite for the resume CP....lol

Unlike me, whereby I'll collect 100,000 selections, break them up into 8 groups and they combined add up to 92,354.....******!!.......Aw that'll do, close enough :)

Chrome Prince
29th August 2014, 09:21 PM
Yep, I'm a tad obsessive about numbers adding up.

aussielongboat
31st August 2014, 10:20 AM
All this above discussion is music to my ears.
as i have said previously i have seen many systems win for 3+ years then disappear -why ? was it because they had a "lucky" streak that ran for 3 years and now was reverting to the long term average or was this part of an even bigger picture - only more and more data will give that answer.

2ndly data management - i am always encouraged when i see systems that propose that you back the opening or closing favourite - encouraged you may ask ? yes because it provides mug money - i would say in 20% these things are not known until after the race.

Chrome Prince
31st August 2014, 05:42 PM
Given the recent discussions over the track surfaces in Sydney, thought I'd post some stats that may or may not reflect some of the theories put forward for favourites at each venue.


Venue: KENSINGTON
SP Rank: 1 - 1
WIN PLACE
Races Bet : 1117 1109
Races Won : 379 698
S.R. : 33.90% 62.90%
Outlay : 1117.00 1109.00
Return : 1060.40 1028.54
Profit : -56.60 -80.46
P.O.T. : -5.10% -7.30%


Venue: RANDWICK
SP Rank: 1 - 1
WIN PLACE
Races Bet : 2582 2564
Races Won : 812 1536
S.R. : 31.40% 59.90%
Outlay : 2582.00 2564.00
Return : 2249.30 2308.54
Profit : -332.70 -255.46
P.O.T. : -12.90% -10.0%


Venue: ROSEHILL
SP Rank: 1 - 1
WIN PLACE
Races Bet : 3330 3322
Races Won : 1092 2071
S.R. : 32.80% 62.30%
Outlay : 3330.00 3322.00
Return : 2956.34 3047.94
Profit : -373.66 -274.06
P.O.T. : -11.20% -8.20%


Venue: CANTERBURY
SP Rank: 1 - 1
WIN PLACE
Races Bet : 3382 3350
Races Won : 1072 2099
S.R. : 31.70% 62.70%
Outlay : 3382.00 3350.00
Return : 2858.74 3018.78
Profit : -523.26 -331.22
P.O.T. : -15.50% -9.90%

Is Randwick really so bad given the average field sizes?

Chrome Prince
4th September 2014, 01:01 PM
Been some discussion recently regarding Metro favourites versus Country and Provincial favourites on the net.

So how does it stack up?

Metro
31.63% S/R -11.44% POT
Provincial
32.21% S/R -13.59% POT
Country
31.53% S/R -12.93% POT

Doesn't seem to support the theories put forward.
In fact, it is telling that although Metro favourites don't win as often as Provincial favourites, but you lose less money by backing them. Metro favourites overall are better value than Provincial or Country favourites.
That is merely a starting point of course.

What about odds on favourites?

Metro
52.91% S/R -12.08% POT
Provincial
53.28% S/R -10.80% POT
Country
52.78% S/R -11.20% POT

What about favourites that are not odds on?

Metro
29.05% S/R -11.37% POT
Provincial
29.01% S/R -14.01% POT
Country
28.77% S/R -13.16% POT

In summary, as a generalization, odds on favourites are overbet on Metro tracks, but favourites that are not odds on are underbet in relation to Provincial or Country favourites.
There is much more you can get into such as field size and track condition, class and distance.
As always, returns can be improved by obtaining the best odds on your selections. Returns quoted are based on NSW TAB Dividends only.

RaceCensus has now been updated to 31/08/2014 and updates are being sent out tomorrow.

There's almost 5GB of data in the database covering more than 15 years data.
There's 2.279 million records and more than 218,000 races!

Chrome Prince
25th September 2014, 02:50 PM
Attention Jason M.
Your RaceCensus Update has been returned from Queensland "Return To Sender".
Please email me your current postal address.

racestats at hotmail dot com.

partypooper
11th October 2014, 11:58 PM
Chrome, do I take it that a good place to start is "metro Tracks where the Fav is NOT odds on" but take the best price on offer"? all I want is to break even and I can retire proper!! serious!

ianian
12th October 2014, 03:46 PM
Hi party

Metro fav under = 3.80 SP i have no hassle sorting these out bet fair fav even better.

4 to 7 years
no back markers
nsw tote or sp price easy to beat

5726 bets level stake 0.54% on turn over 36.7 sr

5726 bets to price 0.05% on turn over

behind 70 points at one stage


odds on level stakes -6.13% on turnover 740 bets

claiming apprentices lose about 10% on turn over.

ianian
12th October 2014, 03:57 PM
3758 bets 3.85 turn over 34.9 SR

one losing year 2010 -5% on turn over -32 points

Chrome may be able to do longer as i only have 4 years hope this helps you retire all the best.

ianian
12th October 2014, 04:06 PM
59.5 or less saves 20 points

5 starts or more saves another 20 points

pm of 30,000 saves 50 points

ianian
12th October 2014, 04:18 PM
thats 30,000 plus pm

7 or more starters also helps

Chrome Prince
12th October 2014, 04:20 PM
Chrome, do I take it that a good place to start is "metro Tracks where the Fav is NOT odds on" but take the best price on offer"? all I want is to break even and I can retire proper!! serious!

That would be a starting point only.
You need to account for drifters and steamers, when do you take the price?
Betfair will basically breakeven, BUT then there's commission and turnover charges.

I would look at harness leaders at the bell (a lap out) in running, or look into sports betting. You'll make a small profit either way. I'd suggest Pinnacle for sports betting, and taking a sport you know something about.

For example: I follow Tennis a fair bit.
The player who has the serve for the game is usually odds on and usually wins that game. However, when Ivanovic was playing a much lower ranked opponent early on in the series, I used to back her to win the game that was in play, if the other player, had serve.
I got some great odds, $5.00 and $6.00 to win the game.
She came through often enough to provide a nice return.
Ended up winning the match, but her match odds were a ridiculous $1.28.

I only use this method with well ranked players, who are playing much lower ranked players and their match odds are below $1.50.
Only if these three criteria are met, do I go in for the kill during the entire match when the other player has serve.

The Ocho
12th October 2014, 04:26 PM
How can you bet in play on any other sport anywhere in the world (including Australia) apart from horses and trots?

Chrome Prince
12th October 2014, 04:37 PM
Bet Internet ;)

Chrome Prince
4th March 2015, 12:40 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to the end of February and updates for existing clients posted out.
There are over 2.3 Million records in the database covering Metropolitan, Provincial and Country racing.
This covers over 226,000 races!

Chrome Prince
6th April 2015, 09:52 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to the end of March 2015 and updates for existing clients posted out.
There are over 2.3 Million records in the database covering Metropolitan, Provincial and Country racing.
This covers over 228,000 races!

Chrome Prince
4th May 2015, 09:43 AM
RaceCensus has been updated to the end of April 2015 and updates for existing clients posted out.
There are over 2.3 Million records in the database covering Metropolitan, Provincial and Country racing.
This covers over 229,000 races!

Chrome Prince
5th June 2015, 08:29 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to the end of May 2015 and updates for existing clients posted out.
There are over 2.3 Million records in the database covering Metropolitan, Provincial and Country racing.
This covers over 230,000 races!

Stay tuned for some exciting news coming up before the June update.....

Chrome Prince
2nd July 2015, 09:50 AM
The June update has been completed and will be mailed out today.
For the current run, I have converted all the old track conditions to reflect the new track ratings scale. I will be working slowly on converting the past runs to the new scale as well, it's a very time consuming job!
The free systems have been updated as well.
There are now over 2.4 million records in the database and more than 232,000 races.

Here is the old to new track going conversion I used:
<pre>New Rating Previous Rating
Firm 1 (Fast)
Firm 2 (Good2)
Good 3 (Good3)
Good 4 (Dead4)
Soft 5 (Dead5)
Soft 6 (Slow6)
Soft 7 (Slow7)
Heavy 8 (Heavy8)
Heavy 9 (Heavy9)
Heavy10 (Heavy10)</pre>

*Please note that RaceCensus does work on all versions of Windows, but does not work on Apple Mac systems.*

Chrome Prince
3rd August 2015, 03:13 AM
The July update has been completed and will be mailed out today.
For the current run, I have converted all the old track conditions to reflect the new track ratings scale. I am still working on converting the past runs to the new track going scale as well. Future upgrades will include horse's placing on the General page, and track opening and closing prices as well.
It's a work in progress and will be implemented over the next few months with each update.
The free systems have been updated as well - all show a profit over more than 15 years.
There are now over 2.4 million records in the database and more than 233,000 races.
With your purchase of RaceCensus you get 12 months of additional free updates and the price has remained the same for nearly ten years!
Updates after your 12 months of free updates are still only $60.00 and you can request an update at any time and get all the latest data.
To get a $60 update, you must have purchased RaceCensus and be a known client ;)

*Please note that RaceCensus does work on all versions of Windows, but does not work on Apple Mac systems.*

Chrome Prince
2nd September 2015, 02:09 PM
The August update has been completed and will be mailed out today.

There are now over 2.4 million records in the database and more than 233,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races.

*Please note that RaceCensus does work on all versions of Windows, but does not work on Apple Mac systems.*

Chrome Prince
2nd September 2015, 11:57 PM
Here's some interesting stats taken from the database.

Last start winners
Favourite this run
Last run turf, this run turf.
33.90% Strike Rate
11.41% Loss

Last start winners
Favourite this run
Last run synthetic, this run synthetic.
35.36% Strike Rate
13.13% Loss

Last start winners
Favourite this run
Last run synthetic, this run turf.
31.29% Strike Rate
14.81% Loss

Last start winners
Favourite this run
Last run turf, this run synthetic.
33.03% Strike Rate
10.61% Loss

According those using ratings could adjust for such conditions by using impact values added to their ratings.
Highest strike rate being synthetic to synthetic.
Lowest strike rate being snthetic to turf.
Adjustments to other rankings could in fact snare some nice winners and avoid some poor value bets.

Just a small sample of the versatility of the database.

Chrome Prince
7th September 2015, 10:34 PM
Past purchasers of Racecensus are entitled to purchase an update for $60.00 which means even if you were a client years ago, you can get all the latest data and not miss a thing for that price. I think that's a brilliant value.
If you want monthly updates again, it works out cheaper to repurchase the program and save $315.00 for a years subscription.

Posting this because I don't think a lot of past clients are aware of the cost savings and the opportunity.

evajb001
9th September 2015, 11:42 AM
Hey CP,

I have a new computer and don't actually have a CD drive anymore. Is there any chance you have older versions of the database from when i purchased it for download? Otherwise might just have to sling you $60. I hadn't used it in a little while and went to start looking at something last night and was like, whoops no CD drive anymore haha.

Cheers

Chrome Prince
9th September 2015, 10:39 PM
Hi Josh,
No I don't keep older versions, the master database is updated and the new file replaces the one sent out to clients.
I tell you what I can do, purchase an update via this link and I'll send it to you on a USB stick inclusive.

To purchase a one off update this is the link.
http://www.ozmium.com.au/order/extra/extra_customer_details.php

In the how did you hear about us box, just put RaceCensus Update, thanks.

dpwoodford
13th September 2015, 04:11 PM
Is the RaceCensus database / updates available via digital delivery (download) or purely via post?

Chrome Prince
15th September 2015, 07:59 AM
The file size of the database is enormous because it covers all Metropolitan Provincial and Country races in Australia since late 1999.
Therefore, the database is posted to you on DVD.
If you live overseas, you do not have to pay GST on your purchase and postage is still included in the purchase price.

Chrome Prince
5th October 2015, 03:33 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 30/09/2015.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.45 million records and more than 236,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Chrome Prince
22nd October 2015, 04:59 PM
NEW!
Earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase. Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.)

Chrome Prince
3rd November 2015, 03:04 AM
NEW!
Earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase. Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.)

RaceCensus has been updated to 31/10/2015.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.47 million records and more than 237,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Chrome Prince
3rd December 2015, 12:53 AM
RaceCensus has been updated to 30/11/2015.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.48 million records and more than 238,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase. Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.)

Chrome Prince
3rd January 2016, 09:59 AM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/12/2015.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.49 million records and more than 240,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase. Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Tipsy
5th January 2016, 11:35 PM
Got my update thanks Chrome Prince.

What your database has done for me more than anything else is:

* Provided me with an understanding that a run of outs is inevitable and manageable, psychologically speaking
* Provided discipline to my punting
* Shown that systems can and do work provided there's logic involved and we're comparing apples with apples
* Saved me a fortune by adopting a methodical approach

I've got one ring ding of a system that wuz conceived in the 70's that would work underwater in the near vicinity of an unknown volcanoe!!!!!!!!

Anyone who really likes stats ought to get this database!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chrome Prince
5th January 2016, 11:46 PM
Thanks Tipsy, appreciate the feedback.

evajb001
14th January 2016, 11:32 AM
Chrome Prince,

Been doing some testing with the older version I've got and one query I had was when filtering by the last 600m time, is that time based on the horses individual time or the races time, i.e. time between leader entering the final 600m and a horse winning the race.

Cheers

Chrome Prince
19th January 2016, 12:31 AM
Sorry for the late reply Josh, it is the race time sectional.
I recognise that the individual horse sectional would be better to have, however, there are problems with getting this for all meetings, and also makes some horses look better or worse than they are depending on tempo or pace.

Having said that, you'll notice that the final 600m sectional system rules, still works after more than 15 years. :)

evajb001
19th January 2016, 09:18 AM
No worries CP, thanks for the reply :)

Chrome Prince
4th February 2016, 01:01 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/01/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients yesterday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.50 million records and more than 241,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Tips and notes:
Weight ratio - previously weight ratio has been the difference between the weight carried by the topweight and the weight carried by the second topweight. It was only recorded for the topweight. A potential customer has asked if he could test races where the topweight was carrying more than a certain weight above the rest of the field. Previously, you couldn't include all runners in the race, just the topweight difference, so this has been copied down to all runners, so you can now test any runner in a race where the topweight is carrying x amount above the second topweight.

For example, you can test if a favourite is down in the bottom of the weights, and the topweight is carrying 2kg above the rest of the field.

Defragmenting: For best performance of the database, as it's getting quite large now, I recommend Smart Defrag by IOBIT. It is completely free and I've been using it for years. You can set it to auto defrag when the system is idle, you can also manually defrag your system. I recommend using defrag and fully optimize your system setting.
It is ad free and no spyware is in it.

Please note: I have been using this product for years, but hold no responsibility if your drive is on the way out, you have a virus or spyware existing on your computer.

evajb001
12th February 2016, 03:44 PM
CP I have a query that you may or may not be able to answer but I didn't really want to start a new thread as I figure its possibly a pretty simply answer for someone who has the data available (possibly yourself).

I'm looking at implementing some systems and I recall someone saying top tote is better than betfair SP in about a 65%/35% ratio or something similar. My query is at what point does this becoming approximately 50%/50% as I assume betfair SP is best once you get to longer shots.

i.e. is there a point where you can dictate i'll place top tote bets below X and betfair SP bets above X. I was thinking somewhere around the $15 or $20 mark would be appropriate but someone may have a more accurate answer.

Cheers

Chrome Prince
14th February 2016, 07:22 AM
Well, there is no exact price cut off.
If it were top fluctuation, then there is a cut off, but top tote versus Betfair SP is not comparing apples with apples and I'll tell you why....
It depends (even with favourites) whether it is a firmer or a drifter.
After commission at the short end you often get poorer value after commission with Betfair, than you do with Top Tote.
That's the reason you can't just arb, Betfair versus Top Tote at a certain price cut off.

evajb001
15th February 2016, 10:52 AM
I thought it would be comparing apples for apples because they are both determined at the time of the race starting (net of commission)?

I also hope its clear I don't plan on doing any arbing, I'm purely looking at the backing side of this.

Basically the test is, when a horse is <$4.00 top tote, top tote provides a higher return then betfair SP 64% of the time.

Ok lets move the price higher, when a horse is <$10.00 top tote, top tote provide a higher return then betfair SP 53% of the time.

Getting closer, continue testing. Now the figures above are all made up because I don't have the data. I'm just wondering if anyone has the data to be able to do that kind of test and find a rough guide for a cutoff point. Obviously it can only be a rough guide because prices firm or drift as CP said but say the cutoff is $15.00 and you know your horse is going to be paying $40-$50 then you know straight away I need to place this on betfair SP. vice versa if you know the horse is likely to start fave at <$4.00 odds then you know straight away ok I'm likely to get more value on top tote so i'll place it with a corporate.

Hope that all makes sense. Once again any help hugely appreciated and sorry for the posting in this thread CP. Can start a new thread if you wish?

Chrome Prince
15th February 2016, 02:20 PM
No, you can add to this thread if you like.
Even though they are both determined at the start of the race net of commission as you say, if a horse is $10.00 into $5.00 for example, top tote is going to be better, because the Betfairians will have it less than top tote after commission.
If it's $5.00 out to $10.00, the Betfairians will have it way over top tote even after commission.

However, if you want a cut off regardless, then you're best to download the data from Betfair and I'm sure someone on the forum might have that data, sorry I don't have that data, just closing single tote prices and SP prices on course.

evajb001
15th February 2016, 02:53 PM
If a horse is $10.00 into $5.00 wouldn't that be somewhat reflected in both the Betfair SP and Top Tote or am I confusing/missing something?

The concept I'm thinking of may seem reasonably trivial but I just figure if there is some way to eek out any additional bit of value in terms of what price i'm achieving then that just adds to the bottom line.

Unfortunately I've only recorded the BetfairSP prices for the 1300 races i've noted down in excel so far with my ratings etc. I've just checked one bookie and they have the top tote results going back some way. Might have to manually grab that and compare over my 1300 races to begin with.

evajb001
15th February 2016, 04:48 PM
Did a small test across about 350 races and top tote came out on top and not just across low price ranges but also the higher ones. I know only a small sample size and couldn't really test anything above $100 but it seems just placing everything with Top Tote seems like the way to go for now. I can see why bookies would be banning any accounts with a sniff of being profitable because top tote would just be costing them so much.

Anyway i'll leave the discussion there for now unless others have anything to provide, cheers.

Chrome Prince
3rd March 2016, 08:25 AM
RaceCensus has been updated to 29/02/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients yesterday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.54 million records and more than 245,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
4th April 2016, 10:52 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/03/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients today.
RaceCensus now has over 2.58 million records and more than 248,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
3rd May 2016, 03:26 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 30/04/2016.
Updates have were posted out to clients yesterday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.6 million records and more than 254,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
6th June 2016, 08:56 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/05/2016.
Updates have were posted out to clients today.
RaceCensus now has over 2.6 million records and more than 257,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
3rd July 2016, 02:07 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 30/06/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.7 million records and more than 260,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Tipsy
8th July 2016, 03:17 PM
I don't know how any punter can get anywhere without a database. Even those who pooh pooh databases regularly quote statistics, and they don't see the irony in this! lol

Very well done Chrome Prince, I've not found any irregularities in your database, it's all good, as is your help! (You can send me the $20 later) :)

Chrome Prince
3rd August 2016, 11:39 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/07/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients.
RaceCensus now has over 2.7 million records and more than 264,000 races.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
3rd August 2016, 11:42 PM
I don't know how any punter can get anywhere without a database. Even those who pooh pooh databases regularly quote statistics, and they don't see the irony in this! lol

Very well done Chrome Prince, I've not found any irregularities in your database, it's all good, as is your help! (You can send me the $20 later) :)

Cheers Tipsy, constantly working on any irregularities and rectifying them with each update.
Also working on retrospectively changing the old track goings to the newer track goings.

Chrome Prince
6th September 2016, 11:04 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/08/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients last Friday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.7 million records and more than 269,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
4th November 2016, 09:08 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/10/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients today.
RaceCensus now has over 2.8 million records and more than 271,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
6th December 2016, 10:09 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 30/11/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients today.
RaceCensus now has over 2.83 million records and more than 273,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
5th January 2017, 04:52 AM
Hope you all had a nice Christmas and Happy New year to all forum members.

RaceCensus has been updated to 31/12/2016.
Updates have been posted out to clients yesterday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.84 million records and more than 275,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
6th February 2017, 09:58 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 31/01/2017.
Updates have been posted out to clients today.
RaceCensus now has over 2.86 million records and more than 276,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy only please http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

Chrome Prince
6th March 2017, 12:30 PM
RaceCensus has been updated to 28/02/2017.
Updates were posted out to clients Saturday.
RaceCensus now has over 2.87 million records and more than 277,000 races with five start form.
Compatible with all versions of Windows.

Don't forget you can earn a $100 cash rebate on your purchase.
Email Guy http://www.propun.com.au/contact.html and ask how to qualify.
(Before or after purchase).
Also applies retrospectively to past purchasers.

If clients or prospective purchasers have any questions, this is the part of the forum made available to do so. :)