Shaun
26th February 2016, 02:27 AM
I know we have been over this 101 times but i am just after some feedback on what your thoughts are on this situation.
I ran a weeks back testing on my top selection and i got these results.
S/R 20.83%
A/Price $5.15
P.O.T 7.34%
Now backing the runners to my prices i was able to increase the P.O.T to 17.51%
Now if i was betting to my prices for example i priced the runner at $3.00 and it was paying $5.00 and i wanted to win $100 i would back it for $50 giving me an actual profit of $200, now just say the runners price was $2.80 should i still back to my prices and accept a less return and just consider the runner is an underlay there for i am putting less money on it or should i back it to the actual price.
Now i know the argument about not backing underlays but i will get in to that one later.
P.S i ran a test to exclude underlays and increased the P.O.T to 25.15% so i am not sure my question is valid any more.
I ran a weeks back testing on my top selection and i got these results.
S/R 20.83%
A/Price $5.15
P.O.T 7.34%
Now backing the runners to my prices i was able to increase the P.O.T to 17.51%
Now if i was betting to my prices for example i priced the runner at $3.00 and it was paying $5.00 and i wanted to win $100 i would back it for $50 giving me an actual profit of $200, now just say the runners price was $2.80 should i still back to my prices and accept a less return and just consider the runner is an underlay there for i am putting less money on it or should i back it to the actual price.
Now i know the argument about not backing underlays but i will get in to that one later.
P.S i ran a test to exclude underlays and increased the P.O.T to 25.15% so i am not sure my question is valid any more.