PDA

View Full Version : Hawkes First Up update


Chrome Prince
15th September 2003, 12:19 PM
Here is an update of Hawkes first up runners.

Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 30 days
Must not be a "first starter"
Must have won first up before

Selections: 79
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 18.99%
Average Dividend $10.86
Profit: <font color=green>$83.90</font>
POT: <font color=green>106.20%</font>

There were four selections last weekend, but no wins.
I am posting this because it's a nice one to watch, but I don't believe it will hold up long-term.
It's based on the Trainer's record and to a lesser extent the Horse's.
All the profit comes from two outsiders, so it's just nice to monitor from time to time.

thekey
15th September 2003, 04:46 PM
Chrome Prince,

If you get the chance could you look at Hawkes and say all his runners which start over 10.0, 15.0, 20.0. He appears to get a number of winners in this range but how many others are there.

thanks in advance.

thekey

Chrome Prince
15th September 2003, 05:04 PM
The key,

Do you mean all runners over those prices or first uppers only?

Let me know and I'll post what I have.

thekey
16th September 2003, 08:02 AM
CP,

I meant all runners, but a comparison with 1st-up as well would be OK, if you have the inclination.

thekey

Chrome Prince
16th September 2003, 11:38 AM
On 2003-09-16 09:02, thekey wrote:
CP,

I meant all runners, but a comparison with 1st-up as well would be OK, if you have the inclination.

thekey


thekey,

You're lucky...I have the inclination today :smile:

May as well go the whole hog, so here we go!

All Hawkes runners - no price filter
Selections: 822
Winners: 124
Strike Rate: 15.09%
Loss: <font color=red>-$30.70</font>
POT: <font color=red>-3.73%</font>
Average Dividend: $6.38

Comment: Using DiviPlus or similar, you could certainly eek out a small profit, as I've quoted TAB prices here.

All Hawkes First Starters - no price filter
Selections: 57
Winners: 7
Strike Rate: 12.28%
Loss: <font color=red>-$13.00</font>
POT: <font color=red>-22.81%</font>
Average Dividend: $6.29

Comment: Forget it!

All Hawkes First Up - no price filters
Selections: 179
Winners: 23
Strike Rate: 12.85%
Loss: <font color=green>$28.90</font>
POT: <font color=green>16.15%</font>
Average Dividend: $9.04

Comment: all the profit comes from 2 bolters at huge odds, don't get too excited :smile:

Hawkes Runners - no first starters - no price filters
Selections: 765
Winners: 117
Strike Rate: 15.29%
Loss: <font color=red>-$17.70</font>
POT: <font color=red>-2.31%</font>
Average Dividend: $6.39

Hawkes Runners - no first starters - price filter $1.00 -> $5.00
Selections: 253
Winners: 75
Strike Rate: 29.64%
Loss: <font color=red>-$22.40</font>
POT: <font color=red>-8.85</font>
Average Dividend: $3.07

Hawkes Runners - no first starters - price filters $5.00 -> $10.00
Selections: 249
Winners: 26
Strike Rate: 10.44%
Loss: <font color=red>-$62.80</font>
POT: <font color=red>-25.22%</font>
Average Dividend: $7.16

Hawkes Runners - no first starters -price filters $10.00 -> $15.00
Selections: 89
Winners: 7
Strike Rate: 7.87%
Loss: <font color=red>-$6.10</font>
POT: <font color=red>-6.85%</font>
Average Dividend: $11.84

Hawkes Runners - no first starters - price filters $15.00 -> $20.00
Selections: 57
Winners: 3
Strike Rate: 5.26%
Loss: <font color=red>-$3.90</font>
POT: <font color=red>-6.84%</font>
Average Dividend: $17.70

Hawkes Runners - no first starters - price filters >= $20.00
Selections: 125
Winners: 7
Strike Rate: 5.60%
Loss: <font color=green>$89.50</font>
POT: <font color=green>71.60%</font>
Average Dividend: $30.64

Comment: If you're looking at this area, it's a rollercoaster ride - be prepared for six to eight months of losses before the big cahoona hits.
It may not even happen and you'll be left with a wad of useless tickets.
All the profit came from 1.5 runners.
It may never happen again.

Now I'll get onto first up from a spell of 30 days or more. All these will be non first starters though, as the initial analysis proved it's pretty useless including them unless you have access to inside info.

Hawkes first up - price filter $1.00 -> $5.00
Selections: 49
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 30.61%
Loss: <font color=red>-$0.50</font>
POT: <font color=red>-1.02%</font>
Average Dividend: $3.23

Comment: I believe that using DiviPlus and only possibly one further filter, this could be profitable over time.

Hawkes first up - price filter $5.00 -> $10.00
Selections: 46
Winners: 2
Strike Rate: 4.35%
Loss: <font color=red>-$30.60</font>
POT: <font color=red>-66.52%</font>
Average Dividend: $7.70

Comment: Hopeless.

Hawkes first up - price filter $10.00 -> $15.00
Selections: 22
Winners: 2
Strike Rate: 9.09%
Loss: <font color=green>$0.20</font>
POT: <font color=green>0.91%</font>
Average Dividend: $11.10

Comment: only 2 winners to go on, could go any way in the future.

Hawkes first up - price filter $15.00 -> $20.00
Selections: 15
Winners: 2
Strike Rate: 13.33%
Loss: <font color=green>$22.60</font>
POT: <font color=green>150.67%</font> :eek:
Average Dividend: $18.80

Comments: Sounds like this should be included in the glossy brochures - BUT only 2 winners, probably won't win in the long-run.

Hawkes first up - price filter >=$20.00
Selections: 49
Winners: 3
Strike Rate: 6.12%
Loss: <font color=green>$55.20</font>
POT: <font color=green>112.65%</font>
Average Dividend: $34.73
:eek: I'll take direct debit :lol:

Comment: same as above - pie in the sky really. But a fun system if you play for fun with $1 bets etc.

SUMMARY:
In summary I think the best potential is to apply some further small filters on first up from spell horses that are well fancied, bet using Diviplus and you have some high strike rate profits. I'd investigate some of the minor losses further but avoid the profitable ones where all the profits come from one or two horses, just not viable to have any confidence in future results.

I really wish I had a database that was at least ten times the size of my current one, so I could draw some more reliable data.
We'll have to wait.

Hope this helps.

(P.S. please don't ask me to compare all the trainers, it took me over an hour to type all this). :lol:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2003-09-16 16:08 ]</font>

thekey
16th September 2003, 04:58 PM
CP

Top effort that!
Pretty much confirmed what I thought. You make a very valid point re: small sample sizes though.

To me the most amazing stat is that from over 800+ runners there is only a 3% loss. This obviously is aided by a few big divvies... but still. I would suggest that very few trainers could sustain such figures long term with so many starters and over 4 states.

Chrome Prince
16th September 2003, 05:40 PM
Hi thekey,

glad it's appreciated.

If you notice eliminating first starters brought the loss to only -2.31% LOT.

Getting the best (or better than TAB) prices makes it profitable.

As you say the sample size is a concern and so are the two or three extraordinary dividends which skew the results a little.

I'll come back and update this in a few months.

noel
17th September 2003, 05:29 AM
chrome prince,
when i originally started this thread i meant first up after a "spell" of 3 months or more.....can you do stats on that??
cheers, noel

Dale
18th September 2003, 11:21 AM
Hi guys interesting stuff.

A while back i noticed a trend with the top trainers to spell a good young horse after it gets a win it's first preparation,these horse when given a bit more time to mature turn out to be among the stars of the stable.

I suggest backing them with increasing stakes untill they win or backing these horse at level stakes untill theyv'e had about 24 starts as by then their best is usually behind them.

In keeping in line with this thread if you only backed Hawkes horses that are first up after a spell and are coming off a last start win a profit might be the end result.

Chrome Prince
18th September 2003, 04:01 PM
Hi Dale,

Interesting idea you have there.

Here are the results based on your theory...

Hawkes trained runners only
Selections: 21
Winners: 5
Strike Rate: 23.81%
Profit: <font color=green>$22.90</font>
POT:<font color=green>109.05%</font>
Ave Div: $8.78

Too small a sample size to call, so here's the same for Gai Waterhouse...
Selections: 19
Winners: 3
Strike Rate: 15.79%
Profit: <font color=red>-$1.90</font>
POT:<font color=red>-10.00%</font>
Ave Div: $5.70

Not too bad, but here's Tony McEvoy...

Selections: 24
Winners: 4
Strike Rate: 16.67%
Profit: <font color=red>-$4.90</font>
POT:<font color=red>-20.42%</font>
Ave Div: $4.78


_________________
"Cut your bets when in a losing streak and increase them when running in a spasm of good luck". - Pittsburg Phil

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2003-09-18 17:12 ]</font>

Dale
18th September 2003, 06:22 PM
On 2003-09-18 17:01, Chrome Prince wrote:
Hi Dale,

Interesting idea you have there.

Here are the results based on your theory...

Hawkes trained runners only
Selections: 21
Winners: 5
Strike Rate: 23.81%
Profit: <font color=green>$22.90</font>
POT:<font color=green>109.05%</font>
Ave Div: $8.78

Too small a sample size to call, so here's the same for Gai Waterhouse...
Selections: 19
Winners: 3
Strike Rate: 15.79%
Profit: <font color=red>-$1.90</font>
POT:<font color=red>-10.00%</font>
Ave Div: $5.70

Not too bad, but here's Tony McEvoy...

Selections: 24
Winners: 4
Strike Rate: 16.67%
Profit: <font color=red>-$4.90</font>
POT:<font color=red>-20.42%</font>
Ave Div: $4.78


Good stuff Chrome i'm excited lol.

So that's 64 bets for a return of $80.10 hmmm.

Just to make sure these horses are the young horses resuming after their first campaign aren't they?

I'll be keeping a closer eye on them from now on and i'll go you halves in the glossy brouchures and ensuing fortune lol.

P.S.-could you check the results for these horses that have also won at the distance because i've got a feeling the middle distance and staying horses might be dragging the overall return down.

Chrome Prince
18th September 2003, 08:42 PM
Hi Dale,

Firstly, I'm concerned at the limited number of bets these little systems throw up out of a possible 2,000 metro class races.

My concern is that with limited sample sizes, what looks good or bad can turn either way with another 2,000 races.

That said, here's what I found for you....

RULES
2YO HORSES ONLY (3YO's showed a massive loss)
Spell of greater than 30 days
Must have won last start
Must have won over the distance
All Trainers

Selections: 25
Winners: 5
Strike Rate: 20.00%
Profit: <font color=green>$5.20</font>
POT: <font color=green>20.80%</font>
Ave Dividend: $6.04

Dale
19th September 2003, 08:02 AM
On 2003-09-18 21:42, Chrome Prince wrote:
Hi Dale,

RULES
2YO HORSES ONLY (3YO's showed a massive loss)
Spell of greater than 30 days
Must have won last start
Must have won over the distance
All Trainers

Selections: 25
Winners: 5
Strike Rate: 20.00%
Profit: <font color=green>$5.20</font>
POT: <font color=green>20.80%</font>
Ave Dividend: $6.04



thanks Chrome Prince but i'm a little confused,does all trainers mean the three you have already mentioned or all trainers either way there should be heaps more bets.

Also my theory with these horses relates to them having a proper spell of 90 days or more,this is important because i am looking at horses that the trainers are wiling to race sparingly because they have high opinions of them and don't want them to burn out too early.

A system to target these horse would go like this;

#10 race starts or less.
#Won last star before a spell of 90 days.

And posibly;

#Won at distance.
###Trained by a leading trainer/double the bet if trained by a leading trainer.

I have noticed Hawkes and Waterhouse are more willing than others to spell a good young horse after it wins but there also other astute trainers with smaller teams that do the same.

Chrome Prince
1st October 2003, 10:56 PM
On 2003-09-15 13:19, Chrome Prince wrote:
Here is an update of Hawkes first up runners.

Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 30 days
Must not be a "first starter"
Must have won first up before

Selections: 79
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 18.99%
Average Dividend $10.86
Profit: <font color=green>$83.90</font>
POT: <font color=green>106.20%</font>

There were four selections last weekend, but no wins.
I am posting this because it's a nice one to watch, but I don't believe it will hold up long-term.
It's based on the Trainer's record and to a lesser extent the Horse's.
All the profit comes from two outsiders, so it's just nice to monitor from time to time.


UPDATED RESULTS

Selections: 86
Winners: 16
Strike Rate: 18.60%
Average Dividend $10.71
Profit: <font color=green>$85.40</font>
POT: <font color=green>99.30%</font>

Last winner:
27/9/03 Randwick Race 9 Salgado $8.50

Chrome Prince
1st October 2003, 11:03 PM
For those that wanted the stats on spells of three months or more:

Selections: 75
Winners: 14
Strike Rate: 18.67%
Profit: $79.60
POT: 106.13%
Average Dividend: $11.04

Last winner:
Salgado $8.50

Chrome Prince
13th October 2003, 11:43 AM
Here is an update of Hawkes first up runners.

a) Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 30 days

Selections: 275
Winners: 36
Strike Rate: 13.09%
Average Dividend $7.96
Profit: <font color=green>$11.70</font>
POT: <font color=green>4.25%</font>

b) Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 90 days

Selections: 245
Winners: 33
Strike Rate: 13.47%
Average Dividend $8.08
Profit: <font color=green>$21.50</font>
POT: <font color=green>8.78%</font>

c) Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 90 days
Must have won first up before

Selections: 83
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 18.07%
Average Dividend $10.49
Profit: <font color=green>$74.30</font>
POT: <font color=green>89.52%</font>

Plan c is by far and away the best plan to date.

Chrome Prince
28th October 2003, 08:56 PM
Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 90 days
Must have won first up before

Selections: 86
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 17.44%
Average Dividend $10.49
Profit: $71.30
POT: 82.91%

Still holding up ok but not many additional qualifiers.

_________________
"The man who can correctly assess Class can have all the money he wants and he only needs a dollar to start". - Pittsburg Phil

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2003-10-28 21:57 ]</font>

puntz
29th October 2003, 12:44 AM
CP
can your database do all what you did, and
look for a stable mate, then look for if the highest paying stablemate wins more than the lowest paying stablemate ?

Chrome Prince
29th October 2003, 10:44 AM
puntz,

It is not set up that way, but I could do it by exporting overall results to spreadsheet then filtering.

It would be a massive undertaking to do it for all trainers, but let me know who you'd like in particular and what information exactly you need and when I have some spare time I'll endeavour to post it here.

Chrome Prince
9th November 2003, 12:42 AM
Rules:
Trained by John Hawkes
Spell of greater than 90 days
Must have won first up before

Selections: 89
Winners: 15
Strike Rate: 16.85%
Average Dividend $10.49
Profit: $68.30
POT: 76.74%

Not too many qualifiers still.