View Full Version : number 1's
goldmember
13th February 2004, 07:49 PM
wondering the stats on number 1 in races 5& 7 at sydney and melb . can any one help me please
kenchar
13th February 2004, 10:21 PM
After running that through my data base of 999,9991/2 races I have come to the definate fact that some win and some lose.
I hope this helps
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kenchar on 2004-02-13 23:28 ]</font>
stebbo
13th February 2004, 10:34 PM
On 2004-02-13 23:21, kenchar wrote:
After running that through my data base of 999,9991/2 races
Hey Kenchar....
you're missing one race... let me know if you want it and I'll send it to ya! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
kenchar
13th February 2004, 10:45 PM
Chris,
You are wrong I am missing 1/2 a race and thats because there was a bloody earthquake and all the nags fell down a big hole in the track. :lol:
crash
14th February 2004, 05:27 AM
And yesterday at Sandown in R/5 half the field did fall down a hole and no.5 Bust up [ 12.60 win ] came home; well ridden by that good little apprentice B.Cross [ 3kg. claim ]. Thank you very much ! .
Cheers.
sportznut
14th February 2004, 06:39 AM
Crash, I'm not sure that's exactly what happened, but it paid $13.20 up here. NICE!!! :grin:
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-02-14 10:11 ]</font>
sportznut
14th February 2004, 09:13 AM
Goldmember, why do you want to know the stats for Syd & Melb R 5 & 7 ???
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-02-14 10:13 ]</font>
Robby
14th February 2004, 09:58 AM
Sportz,
If you ask a difficult question, you can't expect an answer :smile:
kenchar
14th February 2004, 07:30 PM
Worked today 4 bets return $10.10 :???:
goldmember
15th February 2004, 05:47 AM
I have backed them for years [have not kept a record]and was interested how they fared.
sorry , if you thought i was being smart or having a go at the number 1 system sportz, i was'nt.
kenchar
15th February 2004, 07:17 AM
No one thought you were having a go at sportz, it was just a bit of stirring and a laugh.
As sportz posted what is the theory behind it, as you must admit it dom't seem to make sense.
sportznut
15th February 2004, 09:34 AM
Nah, I didn't think you were having a go at me or my system. It just seemed like a bit of a strange question.
It's not such a wierd theory though Kenchar. Back in the old days, the daily double was ALWAYS on races 5 and 7 and they were ALWAYS the 'best' races of the day. So effectively you would be backing the 'best' horse in the 'best' race. These days however, the double isn't always on races 5 and 7, and yesterday there were actually NINE races in Sydney and Melbourne, so that throws it a bit out of whack.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-02-15 10:38 ]</font>
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.