View Full Version : number "1" system........??
coffee
4th April 2004, 10:52 PM
Hi guy's. Just wondering if someone could check to see on thier data base if this method works. It's pretty easy...bet the number (1) one horse in the last race in Melbourne gallops...if 9 races, race 8 will be concidered the last race...unless there is scratching in race 8, then you can use race 9. My brother always goes on about it, so I decided to check a couple of months.Checked from January 3rd, 2004 to April 3rd, 2004...Results for that test were!
13 Selections
6 Wins.
Price of winners: $4.60,$9.50, $10.50, $1.40, $3.30, $15.20.
sportznut
5th April 2004, 07:19 AM
On 2004-04-04 23:52, coffee wrote:
bet the number (1) one horse in the last race in Melbourne gallops...if 9 races, race 8 will be concidered the last race.
Why don't you just say Number 1 in Race 8? :smile:
Paddy
5th April 2004, 08:36 AM
On 2004-04-04 23:52, coffee wrote:
...unless there is scratching in race 8, then you can use race 9.
Makes sense to me sportznut & I'm Irish :smile: oops!! that statement probably doesn't help your cause coffee :lol:
sportznut
5th April 2004, 09:00 AM
:smile:
I'm not knocking this idea. In fact I like betting on Number ones and I've backed some of those winners including Little Baldy on Saturday.
However, I can't quite work out why you back Number 1 in the last race if there's 8 races, but if there's 9 races you bet on the 2nd last race? Seems strange.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-04-05 10:04 ]</font>
captain charger
5th April 2004, 03:19 PM
Coffee,are you referring to Saturday city meetings only??????
captain charger
5th April 2004, 03:55 PM
Coffee for 2003(QLD TAB)
Selections:52 Wins;7 DIV for win:49units a loss of 3 units.
2004
Selections:14,Wins:6 Win Div:55.6 showing 41.6 units in front.
In 2003 you had a win paying $24.20 and a losing sequence of 16.I wouldn't rely on this to make money but maybe is good for a fun thing,cheers,The Captain
coffee
5th April 2004, 06:11 PM
Guy's,
Sorry for the confusion there. The reason I said only bet race 8 was because it normaly is the last race and with "Murphs law" I don't want to take any chances. Eg; There might be 9 races and then number 1 wins in race 8 and you just backed race 9..."I know I would be kicking myself if that happens"...but thats just the way I am.
Captain Charger,
Thanks for the test mate, I appreciate it. Also it was for Saturday mettings. Thanks again.
So we back no. 1 in race 8 onwards :???:
coffee
9th April 2004, 11:41 AM
Unlucky Phill,
Only in Melbourne Phill. It won the last two weeks. We will see how it goes this Saturday, eh?
1.Saturday Melbourne Meeting.
2.Race 8 only.
3.Bet the number 1 horse.
Felicity
9th April 2004, 12:03 PM
1.Saturday Melbourne Meeting.
2.Race 8 only.
3.Bet the number 1 horse.
07/08/1999 - 26/7/03
Strike Rate ... 14.3%
Loss on T/O.... -13%
BettyBoop
10th April 2004, 04:14 PM
Sydney & Brisbane so far coffee :smile:
coffee
10th April 2004, 10:32 PM
No luck this week, maybe next week, eh?
darkydog2002
11th April 2004, 08:53 AM
Hi Coffee.I believe Felicity has given you the answer.
FORGET IT.Its worse than useless.
I dont mean to be rude but there really is no logic at all to it.
Cheers.
darky.
partypooper
13th April 2004, 11:44 PM
just a matter of interest, does anyone have stats on no 1's state by state and race by race???
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.