Unitab System for Wednesday 7 April

[michaelg]

Hi, Sportznut.

Best of luck with your research.

No selections for today. However, the following would have been selections but for the reasons shown:

Canterbury R5 no.1 - Danzarber (Slow track)
Kalgoorlie R2 no.6 - Arlecchina (Maiden race)

No selections for Tabcorp 5-pointers.

Two selections for my system:
Canterbury R5 no.1 - Danzarber
Sandown R5 no.7 - Tornado Kid.

[sportznut]

Thanks. Yeah, it's looking okay. Will need to do some more work on them and maybe I can come up with a few handy little systems for us to use on the Unitab ratings.

[Merriguy]

Canterbury now showing as "dead"; but Danzarber is listed as a "Late Scratching" --- so we can't win!

Your "My System" selections seem to be doing well for the place at least. Congrats.

[kenchar]

Maybe I'm missing something but isn't S7 #6 GALLIENI a selection?

[sportznut]

Yeah, I think you're right Kenchar. Originally it was a Slow track in Sydney so it wouldn't have been a selection, but Michael didn't even mention it so perhaps he missed it. Anyway, now it's a Dead track, so who knows? That's why I don't really like using Track conditions in any of my systems. They change so damn much that you just end up getting confused.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-04-07 16:58 ]</font>

[Ron50]

Track is rated dead but I believe it is between dead and slow.Gallieni has only good track form.I will just watch,but it will probably win and make a fool of me.

[sportznut]

Never in doubt. Good win. :grin:

Gallieni was one of my best bets today, and that had nothing to with it being 5 points clear on Unitab. I didn't actually realise that until Kenchar mentioned it here.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-04-07 17:12 ]</font>

[michaelg]

Hi.

I use the morning track conditions when posting the selections, so if the track is upgraded I cannot claim it as a winner. But Gallieni wouldn't have been a selection as there were 13 runners in the race - the maximum being 12.

13-plus runners over the past four weeks did snare a few winners, but overall were not profitable. I think in the long run this would prove true - maybe the "luck factor" is more dominant in larger fields?

[sportznut]

Ahh, that's it. I thought there must have been something that we had missed. Thanks for clearing that up Michael.

[Ron50]

What can I say,the money came for it just prior to the race start.Must have been all the forum members.Just backed Enthusiast in Ipswich so do not feel so bad.

[sportznut]

Another Unitab 100 rater! :smile: