View Full Version : tennis
goldmember
11th June 2004, 03:10 PM
which is the better bet to win ? hewitt or roddick
breadman
11th June 2004, 03:12 PM
RODDICK i think hewitt is past his best maybe to much spare time with kim might be a problem too!!!! hehehe
goldmember
11th June 2004, 03:19 PM
i was taking a multi and knowing my luck 1 will win and 1 will lose, so i want to take the better option
breadman
11th June 2004, 03:23 PM
That was my weird sense of humour coming into play goldmember but i have a lot of time for roddick as a player its just a pity he is american. He could be anything if he could curb his anger. But then again the same can be said about a lot of players on the tour including hewitt. Good luck with your bet.
goldmember
11th June 2004, 03:26 PM
so you would go roddick anyway
Mr J
11th June 2004, 05:12 PM
No Hewitt would be better value.
Chip is dangerous and Roddick is more of a publiv player (ie bookies will shade him more than a few cents).
moeee
11th June 2004, 05:18 PM
On 2004-06-11 18:12, Mr J wrote:
No Hewitt would be better value.
Chip is dangerous and Roddick is more of a publiv player (ie bookies will shade him more than a few cents).
The Hewitt bit I understand.
Could someone please translate.
"Chip","publiv","shade".
Owboutcha Unlucky Phil.
Mr J
11th June 2004, 05:42 PM
Chip is the nickname for Srichaphan.
publiv is a typo, should read 'public'.
Shade is devaluing devalue. I.e, if a book knows the majority of action will come on a favourite, he'll make him a little shorter to get more value out of it.
peanutz
11th June 2004, 11:02 PM
On 2004-06-11 16:10, goldmember wrote:
which is the better bet to win ? hewitt or roddick
Hewitt of course, not Andy Pandy!
El Gordo
11th June 2004, 11:18 PM
hewitt
moeee
12th June 2004, 10:05 AM
On 2004-06-11 18:42, Mr J wrote:
Shade is devaluing devalue. I.e, if a book knows the majority of action will come on a favourite, he'll make him a little shorter to get more value out of it.
I see.Like Collingwood have very little chance of finals action,but why give 500's when the suckers will take 5's
goldmember
12th June 2004, 01:00 PM
HEWITT v RODDICK
H2H hewitt leads 3-0,[ roddick retired in 1 match] and has won 20 of his last 21 matches at the queens club.
roddick serves at 153m.p.h to break his own world record and had 10-1 record on grass last summer, but this is the FIRST time they will meet on grass, who will win ?
i'll pick roddick
Mr J
12th June 2004, 03:23 PM
On 2004-06-12 11:05, moeee wrote:
I see.Like Collingwood have very little chance of finals action,but why give 500's when the suckers will take 5's
Exactly.
goldmember
12th June 2004, 09:57 PM
RODDICK $1.50
HEWITT $2.50 ?
goldmember
13th June 2004, 07:53 AM
LATEon BLEWITT, not good enough, i finally get a winner, must be the grass?
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.