Log in

View Full Version : Weighing-in (17) June 16


Go-Long
16th June 2004, 05:43 AM
Selections for Wednesday 16 June
Current Bank.........................$14690

Moonee Valley

R1 No11 Carry th NIL $14590
R3 No 6 Painted NIL $14490
R4 No 4 Rosarino NIL $14390
R4 No 7 Echuca B NIL $14290
R5 No 8 Doublem SCR
R5 No13 Today NIL $14190
R6 No 6 Joy of F NIL $14090
R6 No12 JayJaye UNDERS
R7 No 2 Krayzel UNDERS
R7 No 7 Beaujol UNDERS

Doomben

R3 No 9 Singing NIL $13990
R4 No14 She's g NIL $13880
R5 No 2 Nero C NIL $13770
R5 No 4 Yodelli UNDERS
R6 No11 Moshi M UNDERS

Canterbury

R2 nO 4 Steamy UNDERS
R3 No 3 Sol M NIL $13670
R3 No 5 Pekan $2440 STAB 2340 $16010
R4 No 1 Scramj NIL $15910
R4 No 5 King C NIL $15810
R6 No 5 Dakaf NIL $15710
R6 No 6 Court G NIL $15610
R6 No10 Zanzar NIL $15510
R7 No 9 Debona NIL $15410

Northam

R3 No14 Lady E NIL $15310
R5 No 3 Burst o NIL $15210
R5 No 6 Tropic NIL $15110
R7 No 1 Orica NIL $15010
R7 No 4 I'm com NIL $14910
R8 No 4 Regal W UNDERS
R9 No 4 Kensing SCR
A Disappointing day in many ways, Moonee Valley was a shocker. Again just missing a couple of get-=ups and we would have had a better day, I suppose to come away with the petty-cash is better than losing.

Good Luck - Good Punting

_________________
Go Long & Wide

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Go-Long on 2004-06-17 07:16 ]</font>

jimmyc_dogs
17th June 2004, 10:49 AM
you just won $220...... how is that petty cash??? wouldent it be great if u could win that much every second day, or even every third day???

jimmy

:wink:

Go-Long
17th June 2004, 11:26 AM
On 2004-06-17 11:49, jimmyc_dogs wrote:
you just won $220...... how is that petty cash??? wouldent it be great if u could win that much every second day, or even every third day???

jimmy

:wink:
Jimmy you are right, I appologise, it was a little "tounge in cheek". Actually on current stats for 16 days avg profit is running at $306.85 (Not including $2000 already extracted for income)so if this can hold, month should profit at approx $9200.

jimmyc_dogs
17th June 2004, 01:50 PM
[/quote]
Jimmy you are right, I appologise, it was a little "tounge in cheek". Actually on current stats for 16 days avg profit is running at $306.85 (Not including $2000 already extracted for income)so if this can hold, month should profit at approx $9200.
[/quote]

holy shit, :razz:

lomaca
17th June 2004, 02:11 PM
On 2004-06-17 14:50, jimmyc_dogs wrote:

Jimmy you are right, I appologise, it was a little "tounge in cheek". Actually on current stats for 16 days avg profit is running at $306.85 (Not including $2000 already extracted for income)so if this can hold, month should profit at approx $9200.
[/quote]

holy shit, :razz:
[/quote]
Jimmy You have to take into account the size of the bet!!! At $100.00 a pop $220.00 IS! "Petty cash"! Imagine a run of outs of say just 30, not uncommon, and you are down $3000.00

Go-Long
17th June 2004, 02:38 PM
On 2004-06-17 15:11, lomaca wrote:

On 2004-06-17 14:50, jimmyc_dogs wrote:

Jimmy you are right, I appologise, it was a little "tounge in cheek". Actually on current stats for 16 days avg profit is running at $306.85 (Not including $2000 already extracted for income)so if this can hold, month should profit at approx $9200.


holy shit, :razz:
[/quote]
Jimmy You have to take into account the size of the bet!!! At $100.00 a pop $220.00 IS! "Petty cash"! Imagine a run of outs of say just 30, not uncommon, and you are down $3000.00
[/quote]

Hi lomaca,
You are definately on the ball, a perusial
of previous posts will confirm that 'outs' are definately more prevelant than 'ins'.
The remark I made though was stupid because any return is a good return when taken in context of the 'Big Picture'.

Go-Long
17th June 2004, 02:38 PM
On 2004-06-17 15:11, lomaca wrote:

On 2004-06-17 14:50, jimmyc_dogs wrote:

Jimmy you are right, I appologise, it was a little "tounge in cheek". Actually on current stats for 16 days avg profit is running at $306.85 (Not including $2000 already extracted for income)so if this can hold, month should profit at approx $9200.


holy shit, :razz:
[/quote]
Jimmy You have to take into account the size of the bet!!! At $100.00 a pop $220.00 IS! "Petty cash"! Imagine a run of outs of say just 30, not uncommon, and you are down $3000.00
[/quote]

Hi lomaca,
You are definately on the ball, a perusial
of previous posts will confirm that 'outs' are definately more prevelant than 'ins'.
The remark I made though was stupid because any return is a good return when taken in context of the 'Big Picture'.

jimmyc_dogs
17th June 2004, 02:39 PM
[/quote]
Jimmy You have to take into account the size of the bet!!! At $100.00 a pop $220.00 IS! "Petty cash"! Imagine a run of outs of say just 30, not uncommon, and you are down $3000.00
[/quote]

BUT....... GL HASN'T had a run of 30 loosers
and he DID win $220, so lets just work on the possitives and no negatives,

POSITIVE-he won $220
NEGATIVE- none at this stage

jimmy

BUT....

lomaca
17th June 2004, 02:57 PM
Go Long! You know what I meant!?
Yes I did have more than 30 outs in the six years I have been running my system and in the end it is still profitable.
But! This is for Jimmy! beleive me the runs of outs will come and it takes some courage not to give in and reduce the bet size! (worst thing you could possibly do!!!)
Good luck!

crash
18th June 2004, 06:30 AM
Original Bank $10,000 [risk outlay]

$220 = 2.2% profit on total R/O.

OR... $220 profit [10%] on $2200 outlay [if I added correctly] for the day.

Better than a kick in the head.

Cheers.