Log in

View Full Version : Simple Staking Plan


Bhagwan
6th February 2005, 08:12 AM
Here is a plan that can work if one can select approx. 25% winners.

We keep going up the ladder even if we strike a winner ,until we are in profit.

111222333444555666777888999 ect. to 20,20,20 = 630 Bank Needed
This allows for a run of 60

What we are doing is compounding the figures to crush the percentages in our favour if the price is approx $3.00 @ 25% SR .
At level stakes ,based on these figures, this would normally result in a -25% LOT.
But with this ,it should result into a close to break even or small profit, based on these figures & sequence of events.

If your average price is greater than this ,you definitly should show greater profit.

Of course this all depends on ones ability to select some winners & the sequence they fall into.

Check it out.

woof43
6th February 2005, 10:01 AM
The Modified arithmetic staking method is the preferred play for the pro groups playing trifectas.
It is also used in Negative Expectation games where there isn't a Minimum nor Maximum stake size, and when the payoff is fixed, such a Game is playing the simple three spot in Keno. Using Keno which has 80 numbers, 20 are drawn at random, playing the three spot has odds of approx 72/1 an has a payoff depending where you live of approx $42 down and lower.

But by applying the Modified arithmetic staking plan to your 3 spot bet you can have over 120 bets an still be showing a profit at any stage. I'll post a spreadsheet that shows the power of Arithmetic staking with the Modification method take note of cell C2 you can use either the modified method or the straight method, take note of the difference in outlays.

Once you win you start the betting series back to 1 unit.

If you then think how i can apply this to the exotics with ample record keeping you should be able to turn nice little profits with little to no handicapping.

syllabus23
6th February 2005, 11:08 AM
Wont open woof..Not on mine anyway

Shaun
6th February 2005, 11:29 AM
The change needs to be made in cell C1 to see the difference.....very interesting