Stix's Get Out Stakes Neural Tips
 

Hi All,

Michaelg's posts on neurals has got me thinking and has sent me back to the neural website for another look.

I've been playing around with some of the criteria and have settled on a combination of settings that has produced some nice results. These settings were initially set to my own preferences with some of michaelg's settings worked in there as well.

The results have thrown up good results for the last race of the meetings reviewed - thus the name of the system the "Get Out Stakes Neural System". Also allows me to post them well in advance :D

The dividends produced have been healthy and no real short priced selections have been produced (is this the pot of gold we all look for !?)

Thus far the results have shown: EDITED.

Now I know for the satisfaction of (some) members, I "should" reveal the criteria at the begining, but I will wait to see how it performs and then reveal the criteria at the end of April - give it time to find it's feet so to speak!

I will say that it prefers Course and Distance suitability as well as the Jockey/Trainer combination to be favourable.

I am also trialling (privately) the same system settings on races that are Class 2 and above. I have not yet filtered out any other races yet - ie. 2YO, <1200m race etc - time will dictate these. I will let you know the results at alater date - once this system falls over (LOL) ! - if anyone is interested.

Anyway the Get Out Stakes Neural System for March 28 are:

• Randwick- Kensington R7-15 (3,1,5)
• Taree R7-10 (5,3,2)
• Townsville R7-6 (7,1,5)
• Warrnambool R8-4 (3,9,8)

(Numbers in brackets are in case of scratchings)

Good Luck

Other days to come....

========================================

The only profit/loss results posters are permitted to post on this forum about their selections MUST be based 100% on the selections posted in this forum.

Wednesday 29 March 2006
 

Thursday 30 March 2006
 

• Randwick- Kensington R7-3 (15 Scr) UNPL
• Taree R7-10 UNPL
• Townsville R7-6 WON 6.0 2.0
• Warrnambool R8-4 2ND 1.9

Bets 36
Wins 11 (34.4.3% SR)
Places 21 (65.6% SR)

Win POT 39.7%
Plc POT 45.3%

Hi, Stix.

Looks promising - hopefully it will prove to be so.

.... as many systems/method tend to do initially.......

Your Jockey/Trainer method is going great guns.... I've kept a little s/sheet on the WA selections and it is going great guns (that's why I asked you earlier if you saw any real patterns or trends) something like 32& POT betting 1x4 with 38.7 Win SR and 80.6% Plc SR.... NTB (not too bad!)

Good luck.... as someone else put it.... the "shifting sands of time" will sort the wheat from the chaff.... (except the #14 system :D )....

• Davenport R8 - 3 (1,6,7) 3RD 2.00
• Geelong R8-5 (7,6,12) UNP (Fav)
• Ipswich R7-1 (9,11,2) UNP
• Kembla Grange R8-4 (8,5,1) 4 SCR 8 UNP (4th)
• Murray Bridge R8 6 (5,7,4) UNP (6th)

Still to come and the great white hope....

• Albany R7-5 (2,1,7)

Well, the posting bug has hit well and truly today..... :(

No thoughts of changes or "fine tuning" at this stage, a bad day is/was bound to happen.... good to get it out of the way early !! ;) ..... only tested on small sample.... sticking with it !

• Albany R7-5 UNPL

Bets 38
Wins 11 (28.9% SR)
Places 22 (57.9& SR)

Win POT 17.7%
Plc POT 29.7%

Friday 31 March 2006
 

• Eagle Farm R9-3 (2,12,10)
• Goulburn R8-10 (14,5,6)
• Quirindi R8-4 (5,3,10)
• Sandown-Lakeside R7-7 (15,2,10)

Good Luck

Credibility zero.....
 

Anyone that has followed this thread will note a slight stuff-up in the the summary figures.... my formulae were wrong.... oops! sorry... :(

My apologies, in my haste I typed the wrong figures.... they should of been:

Original Post:
Prior to posting system:

Bets 28
Wins 10 (35.7% SR)
Places 19 (67.9% SR)

Win POT 134.6%
Plc POT 65.0%

After Bets on 28 March
Bets 32
Wins 11 (34.4.3% SR)
Places 21 (65.6% SR)

Win POT 124.1%
Plc POT 56.6%

After yesterday's bets the results were:
Bets 38
Wins 11 (28.9% SR)
Places 22 (57.9% SR)

Win POT 88.7%
Plc POT 37.1%

Now that I have (embarrassingly) cleared the air...... lets move on !

Sheesh.... If posting "after the fact" was bad......I now have negative credibility with the "Main Man" now..... :(