I don't see how as you claim in your previous post you backed the winner of:

r3 NARROMINE
CLOSING ODDS [STAB]

1 SYSTEMATIC (3) F WATTS 6.00 2nd
2 MUHAYAA'S IMAGE (5) J GALEA 55.60
3 STITCHEM (4) C LUNDHOLM 6.60
4 HELGAFELL (2) K NESTOR 5.60
5 DESERT FAIRY (6) M A CAHILL 8.50 win
6 BLACK ORCHID (1) G RYAN 1.90 3rd
7 KEN'S PICK (7) GLEN C DAVIS 26.90

Yes the winner [a photo] was ridden by a good jock last start, but in a maiden so it deserved the odds it won at, but they weren't $15 + as your original rules above at the start of this thread suggest. In fact you ruled out the only runners over $15.

You seem to be making up the rules as you go to suit your post-race results [?]

Me too!

DESERT FAIRY had a rating of 95 [2nd highest]. Why would that be a bet ? OK, you amended your rules to over $10 odds rather than $15, but that definitely rules out Desert Fairy as a bet.

Cinna

I wasn't going to bother with this again, but I'm not often accused of a scarce amount of commonsense after such little provocation.

Reading through the posts others have made today, it's clear that a little more explanation on your part as to how your system works would really help to clear things up for people. Naturally it's up to you. I fully understand that when it comes to systems that a secret shared is a secret lost.

Sorry to see no $10 plus winners at Narromine today. There's always tomorrow I guess.

Pixie

Watch for the post-race results!

Who's ratings?????

Good luck if it's working for you,but I find it a bit harsh(actually,downright rude)that you suggest there is nobody on here with any commonsense.Maybe if you explained a bit more clearly than just ratings,ratings and $15 winners someone (like me) with no commonsense might understand more clearly.

I will explain exactly what cinna is talking about it seams more people are interested in bashing them instead of adding to the thread, no wonder this forum has gone down the crapper.

Ratings Races are these new races that the tab has decided to to give us you will see them listed as (RB78 C, RB78 C ,RB62 N ,) these are the three races they have today.

CESSNOCK RACE 2 (RB78 C)
WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB78 C)
WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB62 N)

Now what cinna is saying is that these types of races are producing some longer priced winners, i would think this may be a short lived situation until everyone gets a handle on the class factor of the horses running in these races and is able to work it in to there form study.

If the opportunity is there take it while it lasts, i hope this explains it a little better.

As for making rules up as they go thats about all you could do in this case as it is a new way of making money everyone has to find what works and exploit it.

Right got it now.
 

Shaun

Thanks. The Ratings Based Programming races. Now I understand.

I wonder if the phenomenom Cinna has exposed is more a function of the quality of runners going around this time of year than anything else.

Pix

Just for the record,I wasn't "bashing" anyone,or their ideas.I simply asked"who's ratings?"As I live in QLD.we don't get that here,that is why I asked for a clearer explanation as to what it was all about.

NP go4it i could see where this thread was headed thats why i thought i would explain to all, Cinna hope you are happy with the post as i know this is realy your idea not mine.