I applied it to all distances

Thanks, Bhagwan.

Those are impressive results and I will now start to bet them.

The F.Curse did not attack the lay method yesterday - I had a 100% success rate.

I've now included the TIM algorithym in the "distance races" (1,400 metres-plus) as it seems to improve the chance of the lowest ranked horse not winning.

Bhagwan, out of interest here are today's selections:

Canterbury R1 no.3
Canterbury R2 no.6
Balaklava R1 no.1
Balaklava R4 no.1
Balaklava R8 no.2
Gold Coast R1 no.3
Gold Coast R9 no.1

Ouch, forum curse bit hard on the first race posted at Balaklava!

Hi, Thorns.

On the third posting on this thread the third rule to the Lay method is "the top selection must not have a total of 60 points or more"

At that time the two neural categories were on a setting of 3. Then Bhagwan recommended to change to a setting of 5 so that this would eliminate most instances where there are two selections on equal points. On the 9th posting I mentioned I would therefore also increase the points from 60 to 100.

Fortunately the race 1 selection at Balaklava had 100-plus points so it was a no-race for the Lay system, and I backed the selection each-way, together with the other selections as itemised in today's earlier posting.

There have been three races already run, for two winners and a second. Let's hope the good luck continues.

Thats a lot to take in, no wonder I'm confused

Yes, it can be confusing as I and Bhagwan have been changing the rules.

Now there are two systems based on the very same algorithyms and settings, but not the total points - one Lay and the other Bet.

Hopefully they will both be successful.