OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Testing Place System (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=22252)

The Ocho 16th August 2011 04:22 PM

I would of thought that nos 1-4 would place more often than say nos 7-10.

michaelg 16th August 2011 06:24 PM

The Ocho, yes, you're right.

That's what I meant.

The Lay system I referred to had one selection today - Gosford 3/13. It started fave on Betfair and was unplaced. If the system continues to perform I'll list the rules on a new thread. There were no accidents yesterday or Sunday, and there have been some selections that were at single figures.

lomaca 17th August 2011 09:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
lomaca, I've been looking at a lay method, and it seems that the higher the TAB number then the more chance it has of losing the race.

Based on this, is it possible to look at, say TAB nos. 1 to 4 in our Place method and see how it goes?

Thanks
Michael.
Yes there is a 5% difference between TAB numbers 1 to 4 and those over 4, but still not winning.

However while looking at the printout I noticed that there is sometimes a huge difference between the actual starting price and the rated price.
Completely the reverse at times by as much as a factor of 3.
Like rated @$10, starting and winning @$3.00 or the other way around.
I will look at that later today.

There is one selection today, Randwick race 2 #5 REIGNING
------------------------------------------------------------
Also maybe worth some thought, (not a distance selection)
GAW Race 5 #1 Callmedan

lomaca 18th August 2011 10:08 AM

two for today
HAW Race 4 Maiden 1 Dreams And Desires $2.35
ROC Race 1 Maiden 1 Spotted Eagle $1.8

michaelg 18th August 2011 01:03 PM

lomaca, they both won.

I backed Hawksbury 4/1 to Place. On NSW Tab it paid $1.04, on Unitab it was $1.00, I got $1.11 on Betfair. Not much better but percentage-wise it was huge.

lomaca 19th August 2011 08:09 AM

Just the one today probably be too short and will do nothing.

IPS Race 1 Open #1 Chew The Fat $2.7

Here is an other to look at, maybe of some value
CAB Race 5 BM65 #3 Old Mystique $ 2.6

Chrome Prince 19th August 2011 08:40 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca

However while looking at the printout I noticed that there is sometimes a huge difference between the actual starting price and the rated price.
Completely the reverse at times by as much as a factor of 3.
Like rated @$10, starting and winning @$3.00 or the other way around.


This is an interesting point.
When considering the old chestnut of the rated price plus so much percent is overs, I have found the direct opposite to be true.
The above statement assumes that the ratings are accurate and take into account the money that "goes on" is no smarter than the ratings.
I've found this not to be the case.

A quick and dirty review of the last 102 horses that opened on track at less than $2.05 demonstrates.

Backing them all less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a loss of 1.45 units.

Backing the drifters less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a loss of 8.92 units.

Backing the firmers less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a profit of 7.47 units.

If I expand the opening price to $3.00 or less, it becomes more interesting.

Backing them all less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a profit of 22.09 units.

Backing the drifters less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a profit of 12.21 units.

Backing the firmers less 5% commission on Betfair resulted in a profit of 9.88 units.

So based on the above information, backing the firmers at $2.00 or less opening price and all at $2.05 to $3.00 we get this...
$ 7.47
$23.54

$31.01 units profit from 398 bets, or 7.79% POT based simply on price.

This is from the last 7 Saturday meetings only.

AngryPixie 19th August 2011 11:42 AM

I played around with the UniTAB ratings quite some time ago. Used a quick and dirty method to convert them to prices, and used the resulting price as the maximum I'd accept. So if rated price was 2.5, I'd back the horse if it was under that price, but not if it was over. Backing only the favourite it was actually quite profitable on the single day I tried it out. Ages ago now but I think I was up 10 or so units on the Saturday.

Makes you wonder where the value really lays.

AngryPixie 19th August 2011 11:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPixie
I played around with the UniTAB ratings quite some time ago.


The logic behind this was that any ratings I did or had access to would not be as accurate as the market. So if the money was on, somebody must know something I don't. Where there's smoke...

I've said here before that in my opinion ratings tell us what we know, whereas the market tells us what we don't know.

Chrome Prince 19th August 2011 12:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPixie
I've said here before that in my opinion ratings tell us what we know, whereas the market tells us what we don't know.


Spot On!


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.