How about <=3 kilos

LG

Thanks, U.B.

That's very disappointing. How many selections were there?

Do you know if there was anything consistent, such as state of the track, size of the field?...

I just ran a quick test. I didn't include any other variables.

I also tested 2 months worth of just 1 selection under $10 and it showed a loss of about 15 units over 243 selections. Tatts prices were used.

I ran 2 selections under $10 for a month

There were 717 selections for a loss of 151.90 using tatts figures.

FR <=3 kg
$1 each selection
Tatts dividends
n = eliminate inferior selections (Neurals)

Canterbury
R4
4
14
3 W $2.40
12
13

R5
6
1
2
5 W $11.60

R6
3 W $1.90
1

R7
1
2
12
6

Summary
OUT =10
IN = 15.90
POT = 59%


LG

FR <=3 kg
$1 each selection
Tatts dividends
n = eliminate inferior selections (Neurals)

Caulfield
R5
8
6
11
10
2 W $3.50

R6
4
2
1
3

R7
2
5 $2.70
12

R8
2
10 $2.60


Summary
OUT =14
IN = 8.80
LOT = 37%

Not so good that time.

LG

Sorry mg,
Didn't mean to hijack your thread with my don scott doodles.

Will trundle off to the QQ thread and brush down some cobwebs, pour myself a stiff brandy etc

LG

Hi, L. G.

It's not hijacking because its about the same subject.

Now for my doodles.

Yesterday, in races where the top two selections were under $10 in the D.S. market but not in the top two of the Tele market then laying that selection(s) had a good day. This also applies to races where the top three selections were under $10 in D.S. market but not in the top three in the Tele market.

There were 19 of these selections for 19 smiles. I might give it a go today.

On the Win Side Michael have you considered the easier races 1 - 4 and the TC they were rated for.
Cheers
darky

Hi, Darky.

I'm sorry but I've already lost interest, however I will keep it in mind if/when I look at the D.S. market again.

That's my problem - laying is much more appealing to me than betting

Hope you are profiting from the method.