ONE winning selection (and there's no guarantees) could not possibly solve any difficulties that some members that your alluding to might have. No matter how you approach your punting there's information in abundance on here that will enable you to fine tune your methods and get into profit. It's all about research. There's probably hundreds of systems on here that can be tested for accuracy, there's a mountain of information on ratings and handicapping, odds, percentages. Whatever your area of interest is, there's plenty of brilliant posts on here to steer you in the right direction. So while I'm sympathetic to those members you point out moeee that need a winning selection, medium to long term its useless for them. Give me your email moeee and I'll send you a couple of selections over the weekend .....

And in there lays the benefit of research, time & effort
And the effect of consulting the wisdom of the Mass(es) and Niche thinkers on here..

Go to it syllabus23..
You already have everything you need!

Cheers LG

So you are implying that Syllabus23 hasn't done any research!!
Is that how it is Syllabus23? - have you not made an effort?

email them to Syllabus23

LOL

Moeee, you will note syllabus23's original post above and my follow up posts which suggest that one does not need ability, magic, mind reading or a eureka filter to come up with winners. Just some additional research - a lot of which can be conducted on here.

How much research syllabus23 has already conducted is a matter for him to decide.

Cheers LG

The best piece of information I can give comes from Chrome Prince who claims to have busted every MYTH in racing. If you read some of Garyf's posts you will also see that he blows up some myths too. My advice is to once again go directly against some of the more popular filters .....

This is hard to do as you might not know what you're really looking for.

So, have a look at your Herald Sun form guide, FRONT PAGE only !!!!!, and you can not only knock out half a dozen, you can put IN filters to the contrary ..... and THAT is where a LOT can turn into a decent POT. Can't happen can it ?!?!

The popular filters to have IN are "c", "t" and "d", LSW, TopWeight, Good Barrier .....

What do you think would happen if you looked for a horse with NONE of the above ?? 98% of the squirrel heads masquerading as punters living on bread and dripping, drinking cask wine, smoking OP's and wearing strides that are being held up with a dressing gown belt and a well worn paisley shirt and dress thongs would be absolutely sure that the S/R would diminish, and diminish fairly substantially ..... That's a whole lot of racings folklore / myths "bundled" into one big ball of an absolutely certain LOT. Don't take my ramblings as anything other than ramblings, test 'em.

Does this make a profit, Gunny, or is it a way to back some longshot winners?

Syllabus23, you have been TOUd. Post deleted. You are welcome to disagree. However, you have come on here to add nothing constructive. Please take your flaming, baiting and ridiculing of members to a Forum where anything goes. It is NOT allowed here. No more warnings. Take careful note of this moderation comment. Moderator.

darkydog2002, you dont have a database so really you cannot say with conviction that "There's no Magical Filter". There ARE filters which with the flick of a button CAN alter a LOT of say 30% into a POT of say 30% without dropping the number of selections down to too few. Given you one under the heading of "Pssst", and I'm and I'm not !!!!!

I ran it through and couldn't get it into POT. Maybe there's a couple of other filters Gunny uses.