OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)

- Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - Lucky Dip A, B or C (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=25580)

Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryPixie

None. Firstly salesman would also need to provide the average starting price of all selections for each product. There's not enough information to work out your advantage.

In theory assume all the same starting prices.

.. and that the Salesman provides a complete run down of the system at the initial appointment - follow up report ?

The minimal info above being the teaser to create an appointment? If this was the aim, might need more lolly = promise / benefits etc to initiate the conversation !

LG

D? make an offer to the rep he cannot refuse. What the offer in content may be is not necessarily money, a barter or swap deal.
Prereference A for a list of prospective buyers !

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puntz

D? make an offer to the rep he cannot refuse. What the offer in content may be is not necessarily money, a barter or swap deal.
Prereference A for a list of prospective buyers !

I like it Puntz. Workable on the net too, me thinks.

LG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vortech

I'm trying to gather ideas around peoples thoughts on reducing profit on turnover over reducing filters

Another example
If you have 10,000 bets and made $1000 profit with 8 rules

Or if you had 25,000 bets and made $1000 profit with 6 rules.

Would you prefer the same return on investment with less rules or more interested in POT

$1000 profit on 25,000 bets is still with random variance for a system.

But based of what your trying to achieve its more of a balancing act. The profit in relation to the number of bets is important. Its relation to the number of rules is irrelvant. I could have a system that has 1 rule and make $1000 profit on 100K turnover but thats not a good thing. But also a $1000 profit on 100 selections may not be a good thing either if its based on 10 rules and looks at long shots.

People would also need to know

a) strike rate
b) average price of selections
c) average price of winners
d) where the odds are taken from (tab, betfair, etc).

Ok, so back into the sale inventives, if there was a option D, where let's say 100 prospective buyers are listed and handed over to this sales rep.
Out of 100, 20 may show interest, out of 20 5 may contact and of the 5, 1 may or may not buy system A,B, or C, or D/incentives
The rule is, cannot receive a chosen system freely, until a buyer from 100 names buys with actual money.
So if get 300 names, and 3 buyers, eventually i would have had a chance to score all 3 systems, correct?

Are you sure your not in real estate?

No, not into real estate, it's percentages. 100,80,20,5,1 and a strategy.

Gees if you are going to buy 1 i would just buy all 3 and make a portfolio, if 1 has a lean trot you have the other 2 to back you up.

See, shaun is the rare 1 percent, he buys all 3 systems and plays his 33.33333 percent strategy with his A B or C systems.
Therefore i get my commission as having referred Shauun
of three systems, A B and C, which he purchased.