Almost a complete wipeout yesterday. From the eight selections there was one winner paying $2.80, and three placegetters paying $4.70. Hopefully its just a temporary glitch and not its death knell.
To date there have been 24 selections for 12 winners for a 35% POT, and 19 placegetters for a 8% POT. Three selections today: Dubbo r8 no.2 - Kelly Road. Swan Hill R3 no.5 - Pay Day Kempsey R1 no.8 - The Spinster. |
Great comeback today Michael, hope you got plenty.:)
|
Does anyone have any inside info why neurals hasn't got Wedensday up,
|
They usually put them up as they get the fields confirmed. Sometimes they are late. Usually you won't get them all up till the day before.
|
Neuralmania
Michael, any clue as to what went wrong on Sunday?
Been doing so well, back on track again yesterday. |
Quote:
KV |
Hi, Spazattack. I double-checked the selections, and they were all genuine. I didn't listen to the races so I don't know if bad luck had anything to so with it. Maybe the law of averages ruled after having such a good run.
The neural site is now working properly, it wasn't earlier today. I'm using my AOL browser. Yesterday the three selections won paying $5.30 for the win and $3.40 for the place. Very disappointing divvies. Two were $3.20 and $4.00 pre-post yet paid odds-on. TO date there have been 27 selections for 15 winners providing a 34% POT and 21 placegetters for a 8% POT. Three selections today: Cessnock R3 no.1 - Montecito Wangaratta R2 no.7 - Poiter Townsville R6 no.1 - Ruhlmann. |
One winner from yesterday's three selections paying $4.50, and two placegetters paying $3.10.
Seven selections today: Hawkesbury R5 no.10 - Yalaad Launceston R2 no.3 - At St Georges Launceston R3 no.3 - Dusky Edition Launceston R10 no.1 - Lost Range Murray Bridge R1 no.13 - Mytilini Miss Murray Bridge R3 no.1 - Hurricane Gaze Geraldton R6 no.2 - Solar Impact. |
Michael, when I asked if you had a clue as to why Sunday's results were not up to par, I should have prompted a little more.
I have found with the neurals, some states are definitely better/worse performers than others. You may be using much more than the basic neurals in your decision making, don't know. However, from experience, Victoria and New South Wales seem to be the most accurate , southern Queensland, South Australia and WA adequate , but Tasmania and north Queensland present real risks . You may find exactly the opposite. You might like to look at your overall impressive results, on a state by state basis. See if anything stands out. Also, distance of winning/losing races may point to an improved strike rate. |
Hi, Spazattack.
I remember testing a neural system some time ago and races under 1,200 metres did not perform well, so with your prompting I looked at these races for this system. Since listing the selections here on Sunday 12 Feb there have been 11 selections for a return of $11.90 on win betting but only $9.40 for the place. So from today I'll delete these races. I also looked at different states but there does not seem to be any advandage or disadvantage. If you have any more suggestions please let me know so I can check them. Four selections today: Canterbury R4 no.2 - Gentille Queanbeyan R1 no.1 - Chezmay Mackay R5 no.3 - Pilliga Albany R5 no.2 - Casual Wolf |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:20 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.