OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   My 75% plays (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=25328)

UselessBettor 7th November 2012 07:56 PM

not a bad day with a nice win in Kyneton Race 7.

Also Happy birthday for the other day.

SpeedyBen 7th November 2012 10:29 PM

$22 winners are not easy to find. Well done.

Bhagwan 8th November 2012 04:58 AM

Well done Evaj.

This is a method of staking one may like to experiment with ,using a dry run first.

Say our base bet is 1 unit on a 200 unit bank.

Now divide your assessed price into the 2nd runners assessed price.

That resulting figure is then multiplied by the base bet of 1 unit.

Example
Top rated accessed price is 2.00
2nd Top rated accessed price is say 3.50
2.00 into 3.50 = 1.75
1.75 x 1.00 base bet = O/L 1.75 units

The idea is to take advantage on the accessed price's , price gap.
The bigger the gap , the more that is put on.
Up to a max of 3 times the gap difference.
Meaning that a max of 1.5% of bank is ever made on a strong chance Horse.

This can be a powerful technique of maximising profits if all goes our way on the day.

evajb001 8th November 2012 11:31 AM

mattio - i'm working on giving it a facelift then will try make it available for people on here.

UB/SpeedBen - Thanks :)

Bhagwan - I've just tested my data in 4 ways including your described method, here are the results:

Flat Stake 1% of $100 bankroll ($1) for all bets:
426 Winners from 1,050 Bets (40.57% SR)
Turnover of $1,050
Profit of $513
POT 48.83%
ROI 513%

$1 Unit size adjusting for assessed Prices through ratings (Note I adjusted Bhagwan's equation slightly and have explained at the bottom)
426 Winners from 1,050 Bets (40.57% SR)
Turnover of $1,455
Profit of $723
POT 49.69%
ROI 723%

1% of Max Bankroll since inception adjusted for each bet
426 Winners from 1,050 Bets (40.57% SR)
Turnover of $41,427
Profit of $14,784
POT 35.69%
ROI 14,784%

1% of Max Bankroll since inception adjusted for each bet AND also adjusted based on assessed prices via ratings (As per below)
426 Winners from 1,050 Bets (40.57% SR)
Turnover of $338,971
Profit of $109,151
POT 32.20%
ROI 109,151%

So essentially based on the above by implementing some staking plans (1% of max bankroll insread of set units AND adjusted for assessed prices) you dramatically increase your profits at the sacrifice of additional turnover and therefore reducing POT. Interested on the thoughts/comments from others, I highly doubt in practice I can turn my $200 bankroll into $110,000 over the space of 7 months but thats what my testing is saying. We'll see how it goes in practice.

Adjusted Bhagwan's method:

As my plays are already required to be 75% of the 2nd rated horse, that would mean every bet would have a minimum unit size of 1.3333 every bet. Therefore I used the following equation to adjust for it so that any play which is precisely 75% of 2nd rater will be 1 unit:

((2nd Rated Price / 1st Rated Price) / 1.333333)

Example: Top Rater = $3.54, 2nd Rater = $6.72

((6.72 / 3.54) / 1.33333) = 1.4237
Whereas in Bhagwan's method it would've been 1.8983

You then multiply this by either your unit size (set dollar) or max % of bankroll as i've done. Certainly does seem like a logical way of doing it, doesn't seem to improve the POT by a great deal but simply means your turning over more money for more profit.

Also i'll post my plays for today at around noon. :)

evajb001 8th November 2012 01:26 PM

Today's plays, still at $2

Flemington - Race 5

No.
4 New Beginning

Flemington - Race 6

No.
2 Zydeco

Flemington - Race 9

No.
2 Lord Of Brazil

Hawkesbury - Race 5

No.
1 Boston Tea

Hawkesbury - Race 6

No.
5 Quidnunc

Hawkesbury - Race 7

No.
11 Merlin Mustang

Northam - Race 7

No.
1 Kincora

Lord Greystoke 8th November 2012 05:58 PM

Evajb and his perpetual profits machine rolleth on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by evajb001

Flemington - Race 9

No.
2 Lord Of Brazil



LG

SpeedyBen 8th November 2012 07:53 PM

Here's a scary thought. With a 40% strike rate you could safely bet a much higher percentage of your bank if you wished. I would wager that your worst losing run since you started is not worse than 15. Am I correct in this assumption?
Betting at best tote/ SP you were up 8.1 points today.
Triffic.

evajb001 8th November 2012 08:16 PM

Hi SpeedyBen,

Your correct, in all of my testing (1 April 2012 til today) max consecutive losses has been 8. However thats by listing the races by venue in my dataset, not by race times. So it could possibly be higher then that if you get what i mean. But your right with only 1% of my max bankroll being the unit size, it would take 100 consecutive losses for bank to be gone, or a very bad string of losses with few wins. I could probably go to 2% but i'll keep it as is for now and see how I go. If I manage to get my bankroll up to $3-400 reasonably quickly i'll likely go to 2%.

So in the 2 active days so far of betting the system live we've had:

33.33% SR
99.17% POT
11.90% ROI
Bankroll = $223.80
New Unit Size = $2.23 (i'll always round down to be prudent)

Had a very good day today, so could probably expect the next couple to be mediocre possibly. Although the start of november was poor in my testing so this could just be the system getting itself back to profit (as every month so far in testing has been profitable).

SpeedyBen 8th November 2012 09:20 PM

I know this sounds a bit odd but if you have a large number of results it doesn't really matter what order you store them in the longest run of outs will be pretty much the same. Excuse me if I'm telling you what you already know.
Whether we are talking horse races or side effects in a drug trial the run of outs is entirely dependent on the hit rate percentage. Your hit rate is not much inferior to a coin toss so if you can sustain it you will never have a serious run of outs.
Congratulations.

UselessBettor 8th November 2012 10:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyBen
I know this sounds a bit odd but if you have a large number of results it doesn't really matter what order you store them in the longest run of outs will be pretty much the same. Excuse me if I'm telling you what you already know.
Whether we are talking horse races or side effects in a drug trial the run of outs is entirely dependent on the hit rate percentage. Your hit rate is not much inferior to a coin toss so if you can sustain it you will never have a serious run of outs.
Congratulations.

Speedyben,

What determines the number of results to be confident in your strike rate ? Is 100 bets enough, 1000 bets, 10000 bets ?

Personally I have found at least 6000 races are needed to check ratings before the strike rate starts to stabailise.

I am interested in other peoples findings though.

Lord Greystoke 8th November 2012 10:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by UselessBettor
Speedyben,

What determines the number of results to be confident in your strike rate ? Is 100 bets enough, 1000 bets, 10000 bets ?

Personally I have found at least 6000 races are needed to check ratings before the strike rate starts to stabailise.

I am interested in other peoples findings though.


In that case...

We need that world famous system tester of yours back online !

LG

evajb001 8th November 2012 10:37 PM

Also UB is it based on how many races you've done your rating on or how many races you've actually used your ratings on for a system type bet.

For example i've done ratings on almost 2,300 races now but the system only bets on roughly half of these.

I agree my sample size isn't the largest or the best. But its shown a profit in every month since the start. If it was a bung system I would've thought it may have been a bit lumpy or lost a month or two by now.

SpeedyBen 8th November 2012 11:35 PM

With horse racing I like to see a full year's results covering all seasons. Even then, you have to be constantly on the alert for changes beyond your control which may affect your selection method.
What I'd like to say is that since you are starting with a small amount enjoy it and let the profits accumulate. If you want to you can take a dividend when you double your bank and adjust the bank and bet accordingly. It is a great feeling when you are playing with other people's money.
I hope that is some help.

UselessBettor 8th November 2012 11:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by evajb001

For example i've done ratings on almost 2,300 races now but the system only bets on roughly half of these.

I agree my sample size isn't the largest or the best. But its shown a profit in every month since the start. If it was a bung system I would've thought it may have been a bit lumpy or lost a month or two by now.

You have to start somewhere. And its going really well already. I say keep it going but just keep an eye on it as last month seemed to be the worst month you had yet.

evajb001 9th November 2012 01:37 PM

All of the following placed at the new unit size of $2.23

Kempsey - Race 6

No.
1 Bengal Angel

Kempsey - Race 8

No.
2 Annarism

Sale - Race 6

No.
3 Family Crest

evajb001 9th November 2012 07:19 PM

last play of the day:

Cranbourne - Race 6

No.
3 Severn Road

evajb001 10th November 2012 11:14 AM

Here are some of the early plays for today, fill continue to post throughout the day just in case conditions change anywhere.

Flemington - Race 2

No.
3 Galah

Flemington - Race 3

No.
4 Hoylonny

evajb001 10th November 2012 12:58 PM

Flemington - Race 5

No.
10 Sea Siren

Flemington - Race 9

No.
8 Tokugawa

Eagle Farm - Race 4

No.
5 Binalong Road

Eagle Farm - Race 6

No.
3 Run Royal Run

Eagle Farm - Race 8

No.
13 Flying Jet

Warwick Farm - Race 4

No.
7 Nat King Cu

Morphettville Pk - Race 3

No.
3 Warator

Morphettville Pk - Race 6

No.
8 Sparkling Bella

Morphettville Pk - Race 7

No.
1 Riziz

Morphettville Pk - Race 8

No.
5 Selessi

will post any ascot plays in a couple hours

evajb001 10th November 2012 03:23 PM

Ascot - Race 3

No.
2 Smart Twister

Ascot - Race 4

No.
6 Solsay

Ascot - Race 7

No.
10 Luke's Luck

Ascot - Race 8

No.
4 Peggie's Dream

UselessBettor 10th November 2012 03:47 PM

good luck with them today.

SpeedyBen 10th November 2012 05:22 PM

Smart Twister helped to rescue a dirty day, Eva.
Out of curiousity, how would you have got on if you only backed the double figure selections?

evajb001 10th November 2012 08:41 PM

Overall a pretty luck finish to the day thanks to Ascot to help me break even. It was looking pretty hairy early on in the day but came home strong. I'm only hitting about a 20% strike rate at the moment so my testing shows it should be up around 35-40% so there is definitely improvement there. My max bankroll is $223.80 and i finished today at $223.53 so no increase to unit size again, still at $2.23

Ill try get tomorrows plays up but will be busy with a work show for clients and wont have signal on my phone.

happy punting.

evajb001 11th November 2012 01:57 AM

Putting my bets on for tomorrow now guys, still $2.23 unit size:

Sunshine Coast - Race 3

No.
7 Wind Wand

Sunshine Coast - Race 7

No.
3 Visona Rose

Armidale - Race 6

No.
6 I'm In The Money

Armidale - Race 7

No.
1 Devilgate Road

Ararat - Race 5

No.
2 King Buddy

Ararat - Race 6

No.
1 Texan Warney

Pinjarra - Race 9

No.
7 Not So Sweet

Bhagwan 13th November 2012 08:29 AM

Hi Evaj.
Here is a staking approach you may like to to test.

1/200th UP & DOWN Staking Plan
Make ones base bet unit 1/200th of bank.
Adjusted DAILY, up & down. (Important)
e.g. If bank is reduced from 230.00 to 220.00
Then bet 1/200th of remaining bank of 220.00 for the whole of the next day.

Betting 1/200th, smooths out the ups & downs more, rather than say 1/60th

This approach is considered to be one of the safer approaches to use.

One may feel more comfortable using this approach , especially if ones bank starts to build to sizable proportions and if one feels that a bad run is just around the corner.

It may also help you sleep better at night knowing that the strategy of the staking plan can withstand huge runs of outs & still be standing to keep on going.

bernie 13th November 2012 09:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhagwan
Hi Evaj.
Here is a staking approach you may like to to test.
Here are a few more of Bhagwan's staking plans you may like to test. I think there are a few I have missed but Bhagwan can fill in the gaps.

10 Point Staking Plan
Bhagwan Staking Plan
Bhagwan Place Staking & Selection
Place Staking & Selection plan
Bhagwan Staking Plan (2)
5% Staking Plan
8 Bet Place Staking Plan (No2)
Money Management Staking Plan
Place Staking Plan
Bhagwan Staking Plan (B)
Staking Plan Challenge
Each Way Staking Plan
Staking Plan using variable percentage
Dynamite Place Staking Plan
Simple Staking Plan
1/20th Staking Plan
Roulette-Red & Black Staking Plan
Duel Progression Staking Plan
Roulette 6 Step Staking Plan
Ladder Staking Plan
Roulette Staking Plan
Ladder Staking Plan (B)
TAB Favourites Plan
Square Root Staking Plan
4 Horse Value Staking Plan
Previous Winner Staking Plan
1-4 Lay Staking Plan
Six Block Lay Staking Plan
10 Block Staking Plan
Black Box Lay Staking Plan
New Staking Plan
Escalator Staking Plan

evajb001 13th November 2012 12:03 PM

Today's plays, still a $2.23 unit size. There were no plays yesterday and all losses sunday:

Townsville - Race 6

No.
6 Panecillo

Kilmore - Race 5

No.
7 Jarrah Twist

garyf 13th November 2012 12:07 PM

And another way to the 100,s already mentioned.


What is a better money management solution than level or progressive staking?

Well the best approach is one that balances two competing beasts - risk and reward. Professional punting is about maximising your returns, but it is just as important to protect your bankroll.

Following literally years of analysis and number-crunching have found the best risk/reward balance is to bet to collect 5% of your bank.

So if a horse is at odds of $2.00, you outlay 2.5% of your bank which will return 5% (2 x 2.5) if the horse wins.

If a horse is at odds of $5.00, you outlay 1% of your bank to return 5%.

If the horse is at $10 you only outlay .5% of your bank to return 5%.

The simple calculation to determine your stake is 5 divided by the odds.

This method works because you're outlaying more on horses likely to win and less on those with a lower chance of winning. You're taking advantage of the fact that on a long-term basis the betting market is a very good guide - there is a perfect correlation between market rank and winning percentage. Favourites win more races than 2nd favourites, who win more than 3rd favourites and so on. And horses starting at $2.50 win more races than those at $3.00 and on it goes. The greater the price, the lower the winning strike-rate.

we maximise our returns by betting to collect 5% of our bank, but instead of using the market odds we use our own rated prices. This means the greater the overlay the greater our collect and it has some strong similarities to a well known method called the Kelly Criterion.

Horses that rate at $2.00 will win very close to 50% of races.

Horses that rate at $5.00 will win very close to 20% of races.

But the profitable edge is in backing these horses at a price equal to or better than their true chance of winning. For example getting $2.50 about a horse you have rated at $2.00 has a positive expectation.

The staking plan involves outlaying no more than 2.5% of our bank on any one race and typically we're in the 1.5% to 2% range. A punter's bank might be $1,000 or it might be $100,000 but the percentage of their bank outlayed on any one race is the same and this maintains a good balance between achieving profits and protecting your capital.

Now if you wanted to get aggressive and bet to return say 10% of your bank per winner, in the short-term you may do well. But in the long-term you'll almost certainly blow up your bank due to one of the most dangerous yet under-estimated enemies of a punter and that is variance.

Proportionate betting with the aim of collecting 5% can reduce the drawdown on your bankroll and is a great way of maximising returns.


You can agree or disagree to each there own.

Cheers
Garyf.

The Ocho 13th November 2012 04:41 PM

I just read that on an email garyf. Not bad for a staking plan.

garyf 13th November 2012 05:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
I just read that on an email garyf. Not bad for a staking plan.
That's why i posted it, had to delete the companys,
Name for legal reasons.

I admit i would never have thought of it,
If you have a good set of prices like Eva's it should help.

Posted it here rather than my thread Interesting Read,
As staking plans were being mentioned on this thread.

Cheers
Gary.

evajb001 14th November 2012 01:35 PM

Today gents:

Doomben - Race 6

No.
3 By Choice

Hawkesbury - Race 7

No.
3 Atsuta

Bendigo - Race 6

No.
2 Kimurasun

Ascot - Race 3

No.
9 Terkel

Ascot - Race 4

No.
7 Business Secret

Ascot - Race 7

No.
3 Tiffany Yellow

evajb001 15th November 2012 01:43 PM

Gosford - Race 8

No.
8 Lady Gazerra

evajb001 15th November 2012 07:43 PM

Bunbury - Race 8

No.
2 Riverbend Cowboy

The Ocho 15th November 2012 09:28 PM

Well done evajb001. Like a Riverbend cowboy.

What's the running total like?

evajb001 16th November 2012 12:47 AM

Hi ocho,

it's been up and down the last few today's but with the protest being upheld at bunbury tonight it means its set a new max slightly above the previous so new unit size. new account size is $224.69 so unit size is now $2.24 rather then $2.23. In 8 days to be up with a strike rate of only 23.40% makes me semi-happy. Testing showed that in the long term the strike rate was about 36% so hopefully there are a few more winners around the corner soon.

On a side note i'm hitting 65.38% on NBA at the moment and up about 8.26 units.

The Ocho 16th November 2012 07:13 AM

That's great evajb001. To be below your expected S/R and still producing a profit has got to be a beautiful thing. Well done.

AngryPixie 16th November 2012 08:17 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
That's great evajb001. To be below your expected S/R and still producing a profit has got to be a beautiful thing. Well done.


Expected or observed? The 36% is a historic observed strike rate. The expected strike rate would be the sum of each starting price expressed as a percentage. Being below your expected strike rate could be bad in the longer term. Being below your historic observed strike rate is of much less significance as strike rate is a function of the price accepted.

If your strike rate is down your selections starting at longer odds may be an answer amongst a few.

evajb001 16th November 2012 05:55 PM

All at new unit size of $2.24

Geraldton - Race 3

No.
1 Kneedeep

Geraldton - Race 4

No.
6 Bernina Heights

Geraldton - Race 5

No.
1 Bali Cruiser

Moonee Valley - Race 2

No.
5 Orbicat

Moonee Valley - Race 4

No.
8 Halle Rocks

Moonee Valley - Race 6

No.
6 Arctic Flight

Canterbury - Race 4

No.
5 Animoso

Canterbury - Race 6

No.
11 Inventive

Canterbury - Race 7

No.
4 Ingham Magic

evajb001 17th November 2012 12:25 PM

Plays for today, new unit size after some success last night ($2.30)

Sandown-Hillside - Race 2

No.
1 Angelic Light

Sandown-Hillside - Race 3

No.
6 Verdant

Sandown-Hillside - Race 4

No.
4 Star Of Giselle

Sandown-Hillside - Race 5

No.
2 Raspberries

Sandown-Hillside - Race 7

No.
2 Lunar Rise

evajb001 17th November 2012 01:51 PM

Morphettville Pk - Race 3

No.
7 Off The Map

Morphettville Pk - Race 4

No.
4 Waratone

Morphettville Pk - Race 7

No.
6 Almighty Bullet

Morphettville Pk - Race 8

No.
3 Thorny Devil

Rosehill - Race 4

No.
2 Scouting Wide

Rosehill - Race 7

No.
4 Censor

Eagle Farm - Race 7

No.
6 Bribie

UselessBettor 17th November 2012 01:57 PM

good luck today.


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.