![]() |
[QUOTE=UselessBettor]
It may have been 30 years ago that favs were 20% underbet on X occassions and 20% overbet on X occasions which cancel each other out. Today the 20% overbet is less likely to occur and its more like a 3% overbet or underbet range. How is the 20% and the 3% overlay calculated? Is it calculated by the Max and Min range? |
Quote:
I'll find the papers again and provide the link. It was in papers on the fav vs longshot bias but I have read so many research papers I can't tell you quickly which ones looked into it and which didn't. I suggest reading as much as you can on the fav long shot bias and its movement over time. (it hardly exists on betfair for example). |
Quote:
So there is now a plethora of freely available real-time information, making the market for WIN betting much more transparent and efficient from a pricing perspective. Would seem to indicate that bigger opportunities now lie in the multiples or an arbitrage angle of some kind? LG |
Spot on Your Lordship.
|
With that 4 corners program last week I now realize why faves only win about 30% of the time - because the other races are rigged so that some outsider wins. No wonder just backing the fave doesn't work.
|
Quote:
If its in a suitable race and the trainer has backed it up fairly quickly from its most recent start i would be all over it like a cheap suit |
Quote:
Even more so if it was in the market last start and failed. |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:56 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.