Quote:
What relevance does this have to the original topic posted by michaelg? Regards |
And where is the logic, might as well throw darts at a board and back the number you hit.
|
There was on winner from yesterday's three selections paying $1.20 and two placegetters paying $2.60.
Two selections today: Hawera (in the testing period there was one N.Z. selection - it won.) 7/11 Northam 4/9. I've also been testing another method that shows promise. On the 12 months column in the R & S worksheet there must be a gap of a minimum of 5 points between the top and the second-ranked selection, and must have placed at its last start. There has been 5 selections for 2 winners and 5 placegetters, so out of interest I'll give it a go. Mornington 8/6 Northam 7/6. |
From the two selections there was one winner of $4.00 and $1.80 for the Place.
For the 12 months method there were no winners but one placegetter paying $4.30. |
I'm combining the two methods as it is more convenient for me to record them together.
Yesterday from the four selections there was one winner of $4.00 and two placegetters paying $6.10. One selection today: Gold Coast 4/1 |
It appears that I pressed a wrong button somewhere .
That posting was not meant for this thread. My balls up. |
With the 12m selections, what happens with horses coming back from a spell.
I noticed 2 at Kilmore for today in Races 2 and 6 Pete |
Hi, Pete,
I have already lost interest in the method because of my current focus now being on the laying outsiders method. But to answer your query I would delete them from the method even though the Bendigo R2 selection placed and the R6 selection was scratched. Maybe I might one day take a further look at it. |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:32 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.