OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

Page 5 of 5

Show 40 posts from this thread on one page

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)

- Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - A Profitable Angle (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=21005)

peakester

10th March 2011 01:18 AM

"If you incude unplaced overall the figures show a 8.7% profit but you drop the bets to 1/5 of action".

Sorry to bother you Wesmip, do u mean by adding a further filter - ie unplaced at horses last start, the profit improves to 8.7%

Cheers Tony

wesmip1

10th March 2011 04:33 PM

Yes thats right. But you only have 1/5 the bets. So it depends on whether POT or P is your primary objective.

If you lose 80% of the bets for only a 4% incrase in profit over turnover is it worth it.

1000 at 4% profit = $40
200 at 8% profit = $16

Which do you prefer ?

Stix	21st March 2011 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wesmip1

thanks stix and vortech.

Stix,

Sent you an email.

Vortech,
That was a very good run down of the neurals.

I agree JA is a good one to use and I find it a good filter to apply to most ratings.

I also agree with the speed maps. I record them as well. I can say that if a horse is classed as a OM on R&S then you should avoid it. For some reason they perform even worse the BK. Leaders and Pacers are the ones to be on. OP are overbet and provide little value. Midfeild goes ok though.

Anyway thanks for your take on the neurals. Very intersting info which I will go play with now.

Any feedback on the neural methods I sent you through mate?

wesmip1

21st March 2011 08:30 PM

Stix,

Short answer is no.

I have been trialling so many new systems lately on a new angle that I just have not had time. I will look into it by this weekend and get back to you.

Stix	24th March 2011 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wesmip1

Stix,

Short answer is no.

I have been trialling so many new systems lately on a new angle that I just have not had time. I will look into it by this weekend and get back to you.

Sure thing...

New punter

29th March 2011 09:00 AM

Hi Guys,

As I mentioned earlier in another post I am quite a new punter, I have been reveiwing this thread and really like the methadocial nature of this selection system.

I have attempted to prepare the selections myself, however I have one question that would be helpfull if you could address?

When using the neural seetins, I have set the CP to 5 and everything else to 0 is this correct? Or if not are you able to advise what settings you are using for this method?

Furthermore what are you suppose to do when the Uni TAB top rater is teh same?

Thanks in advance.

wesmip1

29th March 2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

When using the neural seetins, I have set the CP to 5 and everything else to 0 is this correct? Or if not are you able to advise what settings you are using for this method?

Yes that is one way to do it. Or you can just look at the CP column without changing the settings.

Quote:

Furthermore what are you suppose to do when the Uni TAB top rater is teh same?

Only 1 top unitab rating should amtch the top cp. In the results if there were 2 cp's that matched 2 top unitab ratings then they were both included (but not sure if this ever happened).

New punter

30th March 2011 08:48 AM

Thanks Wesmip.

It appeares yesterday there was one selection which ran second at Sale Race 7 no 1.

One further question if you dont mind, I notice that if you change the other columns in the R&S worksheet it changes the FR, Is this method based on using the default FR or am I meant to adjust that somehow?

Thanks again!

wesmip1

31st March 2011 06:09 AM

default only

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Page 5 of 5

Show 40 posts from this thread on one page