Thanks, RP.

However I use the info on Unitab/Tatts. It shows it clear of the Form Filter (D, T, C and W) so I have to accept it as a selection.

The anomaly here could be this.

Some guides use 10% either way for a winning distance
While others don't.

So Kirvic won its only race in a maiden at Naracoorte in,
Sept last year over 1430.

Add 10% like some guides 1430+143= 1573.

This would show in some guides as having won in this,
Particular distance range today 1550 while others who don't use the 10%.
Rule, only the 1400 distance rule won't show it.

I have never visited the Unitab site so can't comment on their procedure,
Or where they obtain the data from.

But as M.G. has based his bets on this site that's the best way to do it.

This is only my suggestion as to why some will, some won't,
have this stat.

Cheers.
Gary.

Based on experience I believe tatts uses a within 50m rule at this distance. So it would need to have won between 1500 and 1600 to get a D.

That would explain it then U.B.

Cheers.

Thanks, gents.

One learns something every day.

Correction - the selection for Bunbury race 6 is not no.16 but no.17.

A good day - from the 24 selections there were 24 smiles for a profit of $226.41.

It's now a week since introducing the Form Filters. During these seven days there's been 146 selections for 146 smiles for a profit of $860.

Good stuff Michaelg!

Glad to see the new filters working.

Thanks, TheSchmile.

The Form Filters also apply to the recent Lay Neural Outsiders method.

And to date (5 days) there have been 150 selections for 150 smiles for a profit of $125.00 from $33 liability bets. Pity they weren't $333 liability bets, but there's still more testing to do before I consider increasing the bet size.

An excellent filter, TheSchmile, thanks for bringing it to my notice.

Today's selections:

Canterbury
4/9

Goulburn
4/4
8/4, 5, 10

Quirindi
1/14
2/1, 6, 11
4/7
5/9

Donald
1/8, 9
2/7
3/15
5/14

Ipswich
2/8
4/5, 10
5/4
7/13