Protest Upheld
 

Gotta say I know I was on the winner (should have been anyway) Pathetic effort from the stewards, how the **** can that protest be upheld the original interference was caused by Rodd's mount and the horse inside of him.

There was a bump maybe around 20 metres or so from the line and it was the tiniest of bumps These buffoons just have not got a clue.

we have the worst stewards in the world up here in the states. especially night races. you can see clear violations and they call it official or the will call an inquiry but theyll dismiss two seconds later. you wonder if anyone is working in the stewards room. you guys at least have hearings which i think is great. the jocks here just get on a phone for a minute and give there excuses.

IMHO the third horse caused some of that bumping at the end, then she gets the win lol

What race?

i think they are talking about the 7th at flemington.

King Diamond was the 3rd horse initally and 2nd after the protest. It wasn't awarded the race.

Thanks.

Raw Instinct we suspect the Forum word censor might have saved you from a suspension. Please note if a profanity is seen in this forum there is an automatic suspension. That includes using abbreviations or ways to get around the Forum word censor etc.

agree 100% raw, couple of guys at work had some quaddie bets on and didnt have the initial winner. I told them they had no hope, they said the horse was laying oll over him, but the vision they were refering to(overhead view) was when the eventual winner was past them both and therefore must have been after the line. Before that there was nothing that should ever have been considered to uphold a protest. After the first vision I saw I laughed and said I can't believe they are wasting peoples time with this...

Post deleted. An uncalled for flame of Management. Last warning.

For your information the forum word censor automatically censors a large number of words, replacing letters with *. Sometimes innocent words get caught.

The Forum Terms of Use are perfectly clear about attempting to post a profanity:

Postings that circumvent censored words. Users should not attempt to bypass the forum word censor software by altering the spelling, or any other methods. Obscene words are banned to create a more pleasant environment for all users. If a business name has been banned, there is a reason for that and the Forum owner's wishes should be respected.

Moderator.

Must have been watching a different race to me, or are unaware of the rules of racing. I called the protest and the result on the Betfair forum, as did others, before the jocks had returned to scale.

If the jockey on Viking Hero had stopped riding and straightened his mount as he is required to do, then King Diamond wins outright. After the slight bump, Viking Hero continued to bore in taking King Diamond off his line. Zahra has been suspended for a total of 7 meetings. I could not believe that so called experts like Simon Marshall and Richard Freedman considered that the protest would be dismissed. Marshall was talking through his kick as he had declared he had backed Viking Hero.

Sorry i ment the second horse, it was not involved in the protest but i thought it had some to do with the inerference

I had thought that if the 3rd vs 1st protest was upheld, then the 3rd horse would be declared the winner, so I was pleasantly surprised by the outcome of the protest, as I had backed Turf Express, the declared winner after the protest was upheld.

In watching the race live, I thought Zahra should have done more to control Viking Hero from hindering King Diamond's run. If Zahra had straightened Viking Hero up causing it to lose a step or two in momentum, and had Rodd been able to swing the whip freely and not have to worry about squeezing the inside runner, I think Diamond King would have been the winner.

Having been on the losing end of a few upheld protests, I think this is the first protest that's gone in my favour for at least the last couple of years. As I said, a pleasant surprise for me, but I'm sure there's quite a few punters who feel hard done by from the Myer Spring Fashion Stakes outcome. I know I'm still bitter about the 2006 Bill Stutt Stakes where Craig Williams had his 2nd vs 1st protest upheld even though Magic Jet didn't even touch Churchill Downs.

In the end I guess it's a bit like cricket umpires. The stewards don't always see things how you do, but in the end it probably balances out and is a wash, and everyone will feel like the decisions have gone equally for and against them over a period of time.