OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   i call this the 2000 plus 40 (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=28307)

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 12:10 PM

i call this the 2000 plus 40
 
this little system is working for me.
I thought I might share it.
self devised...

1. look at races 2000m or more ( just to save time ).
2. (number of wins plus number of second placings), divided into number of starts to be 40% or more. ( after time it gets easy to calculate. - add 1's and 2's and multiply by 2.5 )
3. last start odds SP of 10.00 or less.
4. number of wins to be equal or more than number of seconds.
5. todays odds under 11.0 ( or 10/1).
6. average prizemoney of horse to 2ooo or more ( most are ).

results march 2014 bets 25, wins 11, return 46.50
april so far 2014 bets 10, wins 3 , return 16.00

darkydog2002 18th April 2014 12:24 PM

Thanks Mick.

partypooper 18th April 2014 12:32 PM

mickthemiller, looks interesting, rule no. 5 though, is it fixed odds? if so when and where? I've found that with a rule like this you have to have a definite procedure and never alter from it. For example, you could say todays pre-post odds using Tab Form (or whatever) but always from the same source, otherwise you can get distorted data. eg if you're using SP. it could be showing $11.10c just b4 the off ( so no bet) and $10.90c after it has won.

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 01:06 PM

I JUST REMEMBERED ONE MORE THING...

only bet on races with open age racing.
races with only 3yo or only 2 yo, lead to too many qualifiers.



in rgds to rule5
I use best of three totes.
if one of them reaches odds 11.00 ( 10/1 ) just before the jump, then I pass on the horse.

blackdog1 18th April 2014 02:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
mickthemiller,you can get distorted data. eg if you're using SP. it could be showing $11.10c just b4 the off ( so no bet) and $10.90c after it has won.
Party even with my own system I'm very weary when a price limit is needed.
At $11 level I'd go up to $12 to $13 even, if the system requires such precision, given the volatility of the market it's not worth bothering about.
(if it had been proven that it never won over $11 then it's an different matter!!)
With prices at a lower level like $2 to $4 I might consider a 50 cents range.

Just my opinion! If anyone disagrees no problem.

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 04:02 PM

for further information....

I kept a record of all contenders.

those horses since 1st March to now
( last start 10.00 SP or more )
47 horses, 2 winners , return $6.
this imo, justifies this rule.

all horses who began at best tote odds of 11.00 or more....
61 horses, no winners....
this could justify this rule, imo.

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 04:10 PM

a further analysis gives a better POT.

one which I call the "specials"

apply this rule.. last start unplaced.

less action, however..
since march 1 to now...19 starts - 8 winners - $41.80 win return.

good luck
happy easter.

follow voleuse de coeurs, Sertorius, and boban if starting under 11.00 tote

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 05:42 PM

REGARDING POST #7
IGNORE RULE 4. FOR THIS RESULT

Try Try Again 18th April 2014 05:44 PM

Hi Mickthemiller,

If i have this correct then the qualifiers at Caulfield for the Easter Cup on Saturday are

Banca Mo - 23 starts 11 wins 3 seconds (60.8%) $4.60 last start expected $8
Saint Or Sinner - 13 starts 6 wins 1 second (53.8%) $1.80 last start expected $8.

Good luck with this system!!

blackdog1 18th April 2014 05:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthemiller

all horses who began at best tote odds of 11.00 or more....
61 horses, no winners....
this could justify this rule, imo.
I thought that's what I said. In fact seeing that they don't win a lot over $10, that could be the upper cut off limit.

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 05:47 PM

correct. good work.
how easy was it to follow ?

SpeedyBen 18th April 2014 08:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthemiller
for further information....

I kept a record of all contenders.

those horses since 1st March to now
( last start 10.00 SP or more )
47 horses, 2 winners , return $6.
this imo, justifies this rule.

all horses who began at best tote odds of 11.00 or more....
61 horses, no winners....
this could justify this rule, imo.


Mick
Do you have the figures for a place for the rejects?

mickthemiller 18th April 2014 10:01 PM

after getting all horses which qualify under rule 1 and 2 and 6.
ignore rule 4.
from these qualifiers I eliminated those which don't comply to rule 3
i.e ls odds of 10.00SP or more.
( 47 runs, 2 wins $ 6.00 rtn..... 12 places $ 50.80 return )
of these those that began at 11.00 or more ( 0/29 wins, 7/29 placegetters for $ 40.10

worth noting is that 18 of these began under 11.00 odds ( 2 wins $6 rtn, 5 places for $ 10.70


now those further that began over 11.00 odds , but passed rule 3 were
32 horses ( 0 wins, 3 places $ 12.70 rtn )

thus 47 2 6.00 12 50.8
+ 32 0 0.00 3 12.7

= 79 2 6.00 15 63.5
less 18 2 6.00 5 10.7

equals 61 horses 0 wins 10 places 52.80 rtn

Dennis G 19th April 2014 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthemiller
.....
from these qualifiers I eliminated those which don't comply to rule 3
i.e ls odds of 10.00SP or more.
( 47 runs, 2 wins $ 6.00 rtn..... 12 places $ 50.80 return )
...........
Mick, I may have missed something or perhaps I'm just stupid, but if there were 2 winners at "odds of 10.00SP or more" how can the return be less that $20.00?

mickthemiller 19th April 2014 10:46 AM

thanks for your input Dennis.

this fact 47 runs, 2 wins $ 6 return

refers to horses which do not meet rule 3
( last start odds of 10.00 or more )

I may have made it difficult to understand.
ls odds of 10.00SP or more , should be last start odds of 10.00Sp or more.

Thanks
mickthemiller


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:19 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.