which is the better bet to win ? hewitt or roddick

RODDICK i think hewitt is past his best maybe to much spare time with kim might be a problem too!!!! hehehe

i was taking a multi and knowing my luck 1 will win and 1 will lose, so i want to take the better option

That was my weird sense of humour coming into play goldmember but i have a lot of time for roddick as a player its just a pity he is american. He could be anything if he could curb his anger. But then again the same can be said about a lot of players on the tour including hewitt. Good luck with your bet.

so you would go roddick anyway

No Hewitt would be better value.

Chip is dangerous and Roddick is more of a publiv player (ie bookies will shade him more than a few cents).

The Hewitt bit I understand.

Could someone please translate.
"Chip","publiv","shade".

Owboutcha Unlucky Phil.

Chip is the nickname for Srichaphan.

publiv is a typo, should read 'public'.

Shade is devaluing devalue. I.e, if a book knows the majority of action will come on a favourite, he'll make him a little shorter to get more value out of it.

Hewitt of course, not Andy Pandy!

i'll say hewitt

hewitt

I see.Like Collingwood have very little chance of finals action,but why give 500's when the suckers will take 5's

HEWITT v RODDICK

H2H hewitt leads 3-0,[ roddick retired in 1 match] and has won 20 of his last 21 matches at the queens club.
roddick serves at 153m.p.h to break his own world record and had 10-1 record on grass last summer, but this is the FIRST time they will meet on grass, who will win ?

i'll pick roddick

Exactly.

RODDICK $1.50
HEWITT $2.50 ?

LATEon BLEWITT, not good enough, i finally get a winner, must be the grass?