OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Form (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=16399)

Benny 15th August 2007 04:36 PM

Form
 
I'm back after an absense that included moving from Vic to Qld.

Now, my question is in regard to a horses form, which i shell try to explain with an example. Consider the following.

A Class 1 with 4 horses over 1900m. Each has the following form.

1 348x 58.0 4
2 1517 55.0 1
3 x583 58.5 3
4 5475 54.5 2

Now, 1 is first up from a 3 month spell. Prior to that it ran 8th of 12 over 2100m in a class 1 on a heavy track beaten 5.6 lengths carrying 57.5. The start before that, it ran 4th over 1250m in a class 1 on a dead track beaten 1.7 lengths carrying 56.

2 Ran 7th in a class 2 over 1900m beaten 3.5 lengths on a slow track carrying 55.5. Prior to that it won over 1900m in a maiden on a heavy track carrying 56.5.

3 Ran 3rd in a class 2 over 2100m on a dead track beaten 2.1 lenghts carrying 54.5. Prior to that it ran 8th over 2400m in a class 1 on a heavy track carrying 56.5.

4 Ran 5th in a class 2 beaten 12.9 lengths on a dead track carrying 56.5. Prior to that it ran 7th beaten 10.6 lengths on a heavy track carrying 55.5.

What can one conclude from the above? Well, 1 is 1st up after a spell, and checking through its form it hasn't won or placed 1 st up and goes up 2 kgs. 2. Wasn't for from the winner last and its won both in the heavy and at the distance. And it drops 1.5 kgs. 3 Ran 3rd on a dead track over 2100m and drops 200m in distance, but goes up 2 kgs. 4. Form is to poor to be considered in this.

My selection would be no.2.

Have I explained how i have arrived at my concludions. Or have i left anything out that i should consider.

benny

odericko 15th August 2007 06:08 PM

i yhink no 3 has what i would consider a betting chance depends on the odds you can get no less than 6s

Mark 15th August 2007 06:33 PM

Benny, not sure what you're asking here, but with the info provided, number 2 would have been my selection as well. The price would determine if I backed it or not.




ps if it won a maiden 2 starts ago how has it won 2 of its last 4 runs?

Benny 15th August 2007 07:46 PM

Have analysised the race corrtly and this is a fictious race to explain my how i came up with my selection.

I used the method for an actual race being R2 at Hawkesbury 16/8.

These are my selcetions:

R2---2,4,5,6,8.

The price will determine which one i back, but i will take them in a boxed quin and exacta and bank the value selections in tri's and 1st fours using flexi betting.

mad gambler

DR RON 15th August 2007 08:40 PM

Just acting on a hunch here but would Benny and the recently departed Mad Gambler be one in the same person?

Benny 15th August 2007 08:59 PM

No, I'm not mad gambler!

benny

DR RON 15th August 2007 09:02 PM

You signed your first post off with Benny and your next one with mad gambler
just thought it a bit strange.

Benny 16th August 2007 07:19 AM

Sorry about that. I'm definetly not mad gambler.

benny

darkydog2002 16th August 2007 09:43 AM

I,m going with ****************.I,d be betting 3 as well.

Cheers .
darky.

crash 16th August 2007 04:05 PM

Mad Gambler used to sign off his posts too. Now I don't know anyone that does that here ....except Benny of course :-))


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.