Back 1st. 3 to win
The rest to run 2nd & 3rd.

Ballarat
6/(1,5,6)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,12
Belmont Park
6/(1,4,6)1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,12
Caulfield
6/(1,2,4)1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,13
Eagle Farm
1(1,6,8)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,11
3/(4,9,10)2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
4/(1,2,4)1,2,3,4,7,9,12,13,17
5/(5,7,8)1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,14
Gold Coast
6/(2,3,7)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
7/(1,3,6)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,11
Morphetvill
5/(6,7,8)2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,114
Rosehill
6/(2,9,11)1,2,3,8,9,11,12,13,14
7/(1,3,5)1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,13

12 bets

It seems you've been getting the numbers but not the system. On a cost basis, surely your two best for a win/saver or win/win for the same amount as the trifecta might have produced better results[?].You seem to be looking for and relying on the "BIG payout" with this.Murphy's law and the odds are probably against you here.

Increasing the number of runners and cost and regularly changing the order,surely gets to the point of a "monkeys throwing darts" system.Would you agree? I've lost track, but how would have all this panned out sticking to your original boxed six?

Anyhow, I have followed your endeavors with great interest and dof my hat to your gameness. It's not over till the fat lady sings!

Thanks for your input Cranks ,
I take your point.
The big "T" still remains a mystery to many,
all approaches seem to have their moments .

I feel confident with this current format ,
based on past figures, only time will tell if its got legs, so we will push it until the wheels fall off.

Results
2 from 12 = 17%SR

Divs
$2540,919

Ret $3607
O/L $2016
Prof$1591 = 9.5 units of $168

YTD 42 from 136 = 31%
YTD $7200 bank now $4153

More Tomorrow