Thoughts on Staking
I know we have been over this 101 times but i am just after some feedback on what your thoughts are on this situation.
I ran a weeks back testing on my top selection and i got these results. S/R 20.83% A/Price $5.15 P.O.T 7.34% Now backing the runners to my prices i was able to increase the P.O.T to 17.51% Now if i was betting to my prices for example i priced the runner at $3.00 and it was paying $5.00 and i wanted to win $100 i would back it for $50 giving me an actual profit of $200, now just say the runners price was $2.80 should i still back to my prices and accept a less return and just consider the runner is an underlay there for i am putting less money on it or should i back it to the actual price. Now i know the argument about not backing underlays but i will get in to that one later. P.S i ran a test to exclude underlays and increased the P.O.T to 25.15% so i am not sure my question is valid any more. |
Hi Shaun, You are talking about the top selection from your spreadsheet with basically no filters at all?
I run a test on your spreadsheet and used the filters of: Min Class 80 Min starts 5 Distance from 1000 to 1600 Price of top selection $3.20 or less. Everything must turn green. (cept the price of course which you look at) For the last 5 Saturdays (as far as your results went back), and just on the 5 main states, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth. The results were very good. Strike Rate 32.5% (40 bets, 13 wins) Av Div $4.81 POT 56.4% However I must say these stats were propped up by two very well paying winners. $11 and $13. Take those two out and not quite break even, Paul |
Shaun, i'll send you an email about a staking idea that may work for you.
|
today Saturday, just 3 selections (and I was out all day).
1 winner paid $5.50 (1 2nd and 1 3rd) Paul |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.