OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Unitab System for Wednesday 7 April (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=4596)

michaelg 7th April 2004 10:07 AM

Hi, Sportznut.

Best of luck with your research.

No selections for today. However, the following would have been selections but for the reasons shown:

Canterbury R5 no.1 - Danzarber (Slow track)
Kalgoorlie R2 no.6 - Arlecchina (Maiden race)

No selections for Tabcorp 5-pointers.

Two selections for my system:
Canterbury R5 no.1 - Danzarber
Sandown R5 no.7 - Tornado Kid.

sportznut 7th April 2004 10:58 AM

Thanks. Yeah, it's looking okay. Will need to do some more work on them and maybe I can come up with a few handy little systems for us to use on the Unitab ratings.

Merriguy 7th April 2004 11:56 AM

Canterbury now showing as "dead"; but Danzarber is listed as a "Late Scratching" --- so we can't win!

Your "My System" selections seem to be doing well for the place at least. Congrats.

kenchar 7th April 2004 02:52 PM

Maybe I'm missing something but isn't S7 #6 GALLIENI a selection?

sportznut 7th April 2004 03:23 PM

Yeah, I think you're right Kenchar. Originally it was a Slow track in Sydney so it wouldn't have been a selection, but Michael didn't even mention it so perhaps he missed it. Anyway, now it's a Dead track, so who knows? That's why I don't really like using Track conditions in any of my systems. They change so damn much that you just end up getting confused.

[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-04-07 16:58 ]

Ron50 7th April 2004 03:43 PM

Track is rated dead but I believe it is between dead and slow.Gallieni has only good track form.I will just watch,but it will probably win and make a fool of me.

sportznut 7th April 2004 04:01 PM

Never in doubt. Good win. :grin:

Gallieni was one of my best bets today, and that had nothing to with it being 5 points clear on Unitab. I didn't actually realise that until Kenchar mentioned it here.

[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-04-07 17:12 ]

michaelg 7th April 2004 04:12 PM

Hi.

I use the morning track conditions when posting the selections, so if the track is upgraded I cannot claim it as a winner. But Gallieni wouldn't have been a selection as there were 13 runners in the race - the maximum being 12.

13-plus runners over the past four weeks did snare a few winners, but overall were not profitable. I think in the long run this would prove true - maybe the "luck factor" is more dominant in larger fields?

sportznut 7th April 2004 04:15 PM

Ahh, that's it. I thought there must have been something that we had missed. Thanks for clearing that up Michael.

Ron50 7th April 2004 04:22 PM

What can I say,the money came for it just prior to the race start.Must have been all the forum members.Just backed Enthusiast in Ipswich so do not feel so bad.


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.