21st December 2005, 10:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HORSE WHISPERER
We know who the punters are and if they do it again we will simply bet back on the dog on their tote with their own money, thus losing nothing. By the look of things they had about $25,000 with bookies around Australia."
UNiTAB wagering manager Shane Adams said: "All rules were abided with."
|
This is no sting, this is smart investing.
The bookies are running a business, they should have this covered from all angles.
They got it wrong, not the punters, and should have bet back on the tote after noticing strange TAB fluctuations (inflated pools).
There is no reason for further investigation, the bookies are crying foul....what about the punters who have to cop books of 140% plus on a regular basis.
Wear it fellas, you got some payback! |