28th December 2005, 05:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KennyVictor
Why not tell us what you really think?
These rules seem quite logical and sensible. They choose horses that have been around long enough to have established form. They show that the horse is capable of winning although its price indicates it has the patchy form most punters shy away from. I didn't understand the weight thing but looks like it might mean the horse is coming down in class. Good work Dr P. I'm a little worried by your Sat and Mon rule, it looks like you could be retrofitting (God that's a dirty word).
KV
|
KV!
If I apply my ratings to the horses selected by the simplified P57 method,
instead of betting blindly on all of them (just bet on the first selection after the rating) there were no loosing days. I assume you have a rating method yourself?, why not try it? Even under the strict rules, where there is more than one selection?
Also I read your post where you were wondering as to what to do with horses just under twenty? Well I regard any over 18 as a qualifier!
True if you have a rule you must stick to it, but then, did you run a check on different price ranges? I did.....
Hint re. rating of these long shots, ("Time" seems to be best)
Good luck.
|