
10th March 2003, 09:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
|
|
Vig,
although you've managed to figure out that the other methods are unsuitable, why do you insist on ignoring my method which clearly works and I believe is the only practical approach?
Now, much as I despise Z-scores they do contain some theoretical beauty.
Woof appears to be the only one besides me who realises that Z-scores CAN be used to calculate the probability that A beats B. If A and B are Normal, then so is "A-B", the distribution of every possible matchup of A vs B.
Trouble is I believe it's highly unlikely in typically chaotic races that ratings are Normal.
Quote:
It is not clear how the difference rating scores connected to the frequency of the number of times A beats B gives the probability that a wins. Maybe A and B have never raced.
|
|