So who said I was losing money. And anyway, you didn't actually answer my question. But I did manage to find the full results for last nights wenty park meet.

Mathematical & scientific effort. Know what a Pearson correlation is?

My system on wenty park last night (23rd January 2006).
All the ratings ( every dog, every race; Pearson = 0.28).
Best rating (below a certain magic number), every race ; Pearson = 0.83.
The reason it's "below" a certain number, is because my math produces points against.

10 races.
5 qualifying selections.
3 bets ( 2 were too short)
2 thirds paying $2.30 & $1.60 place. R2 no 7 & R4 no 2.
1 first paying $1.90 place. R5 no 4.
POT = 93%.
Of the 2 that were too short & I didn't bet, one ran first, the other is probably still running.

I'm only betting $1.00 to place at the moment while refining the system.
I know it's too small a sample as yet, but several previous meetings at wenty park & the meadows are similar.


Amanda