![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
8th February 2006, 12:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,012
|
|
Just a little of the topic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by davez
while hardly being on the "dutching bandwagon" facts are, all maths aside, there are many races that are not suited to this type of betting, & the odd few that are. its all about selection, of both the right race & right nags.
in selecting the right races i would suggest keeping & eye & ear out for goodish sized fields where "the dogs are barking", the louder the better. if there are worse bets than these in racing, i aint seen too many.
as for the right nags, they tend to pick themselves in such a race.
|
G'day Fellow Forum Posters
Just as an aside to Dutching in certain fields, what criteria do you use to judge a race as a "good betting" race where yor betting the WIN or E/Way for arguments sake?
You always hear (and see on posts) people saying this race is a GOOD betting race or that was a BAD race to have a bet on etc....
I would imagine some of the criteria would be: - Class
- Number of Runners
- Number of First Starters/Resumers
Just wondering as I don't really analyse a race on a "good/bad betting race" basis, I try and find a horse I think (IMHO) will win the race - I don't really discount - say Maidens, races with more than 3 resumers/first starters etc... perhaps I could incorporate this thinking into my assessments.....
Thanks In Advance
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
|