11th February 2006, 08:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
I had a good look today at all meetings from WA tabonline. For the original rules I came up with this lot below. Aqua D'amore was in a Stakes race, so I dropped that one [could easily win it]. Another I dropped was in a F&M race.
Cheltenham: R5/4 Chemin*
Rosehill: R1/1 Bye Bye Bella, R3/4 Palabiro
Doomben R1/1 Moving North, R3/1 Milady Clang,
R4/3 Lasting Luck*, R6/6 Minassi*
Hobart R2/3 Concurrent*
Stand outs*
|
Hi Crash!
I do not use your system rules, but in some races we are remarkably close with the selections.
Could it be, that by using (any) sensible selection criteria, the most likely horses to win or place in that race will come to the top? (at least ON paper, anyway!)
here are my selection for the same races
CHE race5: 4,1,8,6
ROS race1: 1,4,2,9
..... race3: 4,2,6,1
DOO race1: 11,6,10,2 /this is the only one we differ markedly
...... race3: 5,1,3,4
...... race4: 1,3,7,12
...... race6: 12.4.6,7
ELW race2: 1,3,2,9
|