16th February 2006, 05:46 AM
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Duritz, my sincere apologies for the 'jam' quote that wasn't you. Very similar names and easy to confuse in the heat of things.
I do agree that Child's is a good Jockey, a wonderful rider in fact, but I don't think any Jockey in Australia has a POT figure [until I see evidence showing otherwise] for their rides, only a LOT figure. If they had a POT figure we all would have heard or read about it in detail by now.
If any good jockey is on a good reliable horse in the bush, you won't be seeing any 'overs' too often [a long wait between drinks], because all the other punters will be see exactly what your seeing, -the bleeding obvious. They deserve more credit than you seem to be giving them[?]: overs because the 'public' hasn't noticed? You have to spot things far more obscure than who the jockey is to find overs nowadays. Otherwise, how can there be overs on a horse in the bush capable of winning with Child's on-board? It does not compute. Unders is the more likely situation, a bit like looking for overs on a Beadman/good horse/Waterhouse combo. It will be a long wait.
|