2nd April 2006, 01:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 479
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brownie
No
I didn't say that. If I subscribed to the whole ratings thing (which I don't) I would still bet unders on a top rated horse. But I would only bet odds that I considered fair.
|
So what is a "fair" price then? Some random number, or a price that you think represents "value" against the horses true odds in your opinion?
This is the whole argument. So many people in here saying that value is a load of crap, yet nobody would be prepared to take "any" odds about the top selection.
Why is this so?
I suggest the answer lies with everybody here trying to get "value".
|