6th April 2006, 01:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,012
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crash
Stix,
That's an interesting conclusion. Could you clarify why a system's punter is more associated with mathematics than a non-system's punter?
|
Crash
In my (limited) experience with systems - I think that when building a system, the foundation and iteration process relies on greater mathematical rationing (application of probabilities, rules and discrete arguments, etc) . Mathematics is intrinscally inherent in the formation, evloution and evaluation of the system, then too it follows that progressive (or some form of mathematical) staking plan would be employed....
Where as ratings/handicapping/form which, although incorporates some of these mathematic elements is not heavily weighed when formulating selections.... and is based with a more "human" element and progressive staking would be less likely employed....
.... in my opinion....
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
|