![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
30th June 2006, 02:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Mt Tamborine
Posts: 574
|
|
Hi Chinbok,
Only have data since 1/6/05 (not 100% complete but not missing many races) which I only collected a couple of weeks ago. I have it set up so that I can run queries which set a value to any of the neural algorhythms, can set a minimum value to any of them, set a minimum total and a few other things like must have had x number of races, metro / country / provincial, FGDSH going, etc.
I try various combinations to see how the top horse fares and then I bet a little experimental money on the selections and usually watch my balance go down. I've found a few combinations that show up to 20% profit over the last year but they haven't performed over the last fortnight. Only time will tell.
Of course there is a conspiracy theory that the neural guys have a great system for picking winners but they have shares in the TABs and online bookies - so they get you hopeful with winning systems and then change the algorhythms to make you lose and their shares go up. Well, no there wasn't really a theory of that sort but there is now.
KV
|