15th August 2006, 12:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 40
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
Ozdoc,
I am stating from my experience too.
|
appreciated
Quote:
|
Isn't it better to advise people on what's gone wrong than what hasn't?.
|
yes
Quote:
|
The new version does not have one million rows and Excel never will have one million rows, the file system cannot handle it.
|
i appologise for this, i was given wrong information and not happy about that and stand corrected
Quote:
|
You have gone down that path, by stating that I am wrong, and I supplied proof of what is inevitable.
|
i said it proved stable for me when set up right not refering anything diferent
Quote:
|
I am correct in my statements, just because it hasn't happened to you, doesn't mean it won't or can't happen to someone else..
|
you stated that it failed due to high volumes of data and was prone to corruption, yes you also provided some information to that, and i will not argue with that, what i can say is i run very large files ( and have for many years ) and they have not been corupted nor i doubt ever will be, as said i do not say excel is the worst or best option but can say if set up right there are no dramas and is a viable option for people to use.
|